SXSW Diary, Day Three

Today began with something spooky. With no alarm clock, I woke up at exactly the same time as yesterday. Except that the “exact same time” today isn’t really the same time as yesterday, it’s one hour earlier!!! How did my un/subconscious self know???

Of course, I followed that up by trying to do some work, without coffee. I got a decent bit done, as in I’m only two days behind instead of four, but I didn’t get to the Convention Center until around 11:00 a.m. In my own warped sense of time, that’s what counts for “late.”

Jeffrey Tambor at SXSWiOn the plus side, it is finally sunny!!!

I had a respite because, according to the SXSW website, a panel I wanted to see at 9:30 a.m. was canceled, rescheduled, or something. At any rate, it disappeared from the schedule.

I had a hearty breakfast of coffee and two danishes from one of the many Jo’s Coffee stands scattered around the Convention Center, and made my way to the fourth floor. I was particularly excited this morning, because Jeffrey Tambor, George Bluth himself, was leading an “acting workshop” (#SXtambor on Twitter). Nothing was going to keep me from this. I really mean nothing. I sat through part of a presentation called “What is ‘Social TV’?” (#SXsocialweb on Twitter) just so I would already be in the room (the same Room 18abcd that had caused me so much grief over Joss Whedon yesterday). It was interesting, although it was a bit over my head in terms of both technological and marketing jargon.

Jeffrey Tambor

All I can really say about Jeffrey Tambor’s presentation is that it was awesome. He coached two young actors, Matt and Caitlyn, for our entertainment and edification. As an improvisermand possibly-aspiring actor, it was incredibly useful. Mr. Tambor also confirmed that they will be making an “Arrested Development” movie and ten episodes for Netflix. Life is good.

Laugh by Deborah ArgyropoulosBlogging, hanging out, art appreciation

I just hung out for a while after that. I did some writing, met a fellow starving artist, and did not make it to the Funny or Die panel.

In the afternoon, I made my way up 6th Street, bathed in sunlight and surrounded by hipsters, to an open house at GoLab Austin. I noticed a distinct but gradual shift as I walked a mere two blocks north from the hip-but-bookish vibe of the Interactive attendees to the full-on-ironic atmosphere of the early music festival arrivals on 6th Street. It foreshadows what is about to befall my city.

GoLab Austin is a coworking space and art gallery. Some good art, and we heard from Shea Little, one of the founders of E.A.S.T. (East Austin Studio Tour) and the forthcoming West Austin Studio Tour. It was a nice break from the technological themes I had been hearing for several days.

Adult entertainment

I met up with a buddy and we decided to hit one more panel at the Stephen F. Austin Hotel. This was only the second panel I had attended away from the Convention Center. On a side note, even though the panels that might be most relevant to my field are at the Sheraton, roughly ten blocks to the north of the Convention Center, I have enjoying the atmosphere and the energy of the Convention Center enough to just stay there so far.

We went to a panel called “Maintaining Sanity and Profitability in Adult” (#SaneProfit on Twitter), largely out of curiosity about how they approach their business models. (Lest you think there was anything prurient whatsoever about this panel, all four presenters were middle-aged and decidedly casual, and there were no visual aids whatsoever.)

The discussion was mostly about trends in both brick-and-mortar and online adult businesses. The owner of Austin boutique Forbidden Fruit, Lynn Raridon, talked about the advantages of a physical retail location over the internet when selling, ahem “intimacy enhancement devices” (her words: “feeling is believing”). At the same time, operating a retail S.O.B. (sexually-oriented business) has its challenges, mostly in the form on legal restrictions. A business where more than a certain percentage of its products or services are legally deemed “sexual” in nature (I think they said 30%) faces extensive zoning restrictions, pretty much limited to industrial areas.

As for the internet, file sharing and “tube” sites (like YouTube but, you know…) are screwing up the profitability of sites that offer prepared content. The growth areas, they say, that cannot be pirated, are live webcam sites and “adult dating” sites. Setting up a webcam site from scratch requires a substantial investment in both hardware and software (make a pun about that and you are dead to me), but “white label” sites offer much of the technology and ongoing support. A person can put their own name on a white label site, the company provides the software, website, etc., and revenues are split, often as much as 50/50 between the company and the performer.

They talked a bit about a Canadian company called Manwin that apparently owns a lot of these tube sites. It you are interested in the business side of such things, I Googled them and found this New York Magazine article from a few years ago.

They talked quite a bit about the stigma of having any involvement at all in the adult industry, even if it is only peripheral, like by offering technical help. Opinions differed as to whether people should downplay their involvement or wear it proudly. Sid Grief, president of AAA News, has been involved in the adult business for 37 years. He said (and I paraphrase somewhat): “Being a pornographer is like being pregnant. There’s no such thing as a little bit pregnant, so be glorious in it.” Connor Young, a webmaster and marketing consultant, said that he thinks it is okay to dabble in adult, but to be careful how much of that you let show.

Jay Kopita, VP of YNOT.com and a marketing consultant with Young, made a very interesting point about social media and marketing. As social media companies are trying to get users to basically market to each other, they are looking into people’s search histories, and psychologists and other professionals are analyzing this data to try to determine what kind of person you are. This does not refer to a value judgment so much as a marketing category. I am not as familiar with Google’s new privacy policy as I should be, but I think it might play a big part in this.

Benedict Cumberbatch filming Sherlock croppedNot going to SXSW parties

A friend told me about a PBS party downtown, featuring the cast of the BBC’s “Sherlock.” Although I know several people who would never forgive me if they knew I had the opportunity to meet, or even stand in the same room with, Benedict Cumberbatch and didn’t do it, they would never forgive me (And if they read this, now they know.) Despite his delightfully-British name and the fact that even I will admit the dude is quite handsome, I went home to watch TV with the girlfriend (having probably neglected to mention thay whole “handsome” thing.)

I did, however, find this unintentionally-funny blog post from a libertarian-leaning blogger on how last year’s PBS and NPR parties during SXSW were a waste of taxpayer dollars since the entire public was not able to go to them. To be fair, even without a badge, I heard you could get in if you waited in line. The bar isn’t big enough to hold all of America, though.

Two days of interactive fun left, so I needs my rest.

Photo credits: ‘Jeffrey Tambor at SXSWi,’ ‘Laugh by Deborah Argyropoulos’ by wondermutt, on Flickr; Benedict_Cumberbatch_filming_Sherlock.jpg: Fat Les from London, UK derivative work: RanZag (Benedict_Cumberbatch_filming_Sherlock.jpg) [CC-BY-2.0 (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Share

SXSW Diary, Day Two

Today began with great anticipation and mild disappointment, with a bit of admiration of the inherent goodness of humanity thrown into the mix. Upon my arrival at the Convention Center this morning, I had hoped to attend “A Conversation with Joss Whedon” (#SXjosswhedon on Twitter), featuring the man himself. If you are unfamiliar with Joss Whedon, I first have to wonder how you even found this blog and why you’ve read this far. Joss Whedon is responsible for making “shiny” a culturally-relevant adjective. He brought us the long-running television classic (in some circles) “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” and the ahead-of-its-time science fiction western “Firefly.” He has perhaps the most devoted fan base in all of American entertainment, so I was quite excited.

Everything at SXSW involves waiting in lineBut I got there too late.

Not actually late, mind you. His talk began at 11:00 a.m., and I arrived at the Convention Center at around 10:20 a.m. I stopped to buy coffee, which might have been my big mistake. By the time I made it to the fourth floor, where he would be talking in the imposingly-titled Room 18abcd, the line snaked back around on itself. At around 10:50, a SXSW volunteer inserted himself into the line, about forty people ahead of me, and announced that everyone standing behind him wasn’t going to get in.

So, like Malcolm Reynolds at Serenity Valley (seriously, you need to watch “Firefly”), I withdrew from the line and took a seat along the wall. A volunteer then informed us that a live feed of the talk would be available at a “hearable” volume. 11:00 arrived, and something remarkable happened. The throngs of people denied the opportunity to see Joss Whedon in the flesh sat down on the floor to watch the video screen, allowing everyone there a relatively unimpeded view.

Joss Whedon

Joss Whedon speaks! (via live feed)I tweeted a bit of what was discussed. As is common with filmmaker conversations at conferences, it was mostly thoughts on film, the creative process, and maddeningly vague hints and references to current and future projects.

He mostly talked about “Cabin in the Woods,” a recent horror-esque project, with a bit of commentary on “The Avengers.” Of course, the question of when “Firefly” will be coming back was raised, to which Joss said he’s waiting for a call from a network and he is “not ruling it out.” I tweeted some of my favorite bits from his talk, which I now attempt to reproduce here:

  • “My favorite thing is going into a movie not knowing what to expect.”
  • He spoke very highly of Danny Boyle’s “Sunshine,” which is a good way to endear oneself to me.
  • Of the “Evil Dead” films, he believes part 1 is “the real classic,” because it established the various tropes of the genre. Bold words, sir.
  • He often prefers working with a lower budget. Budget restrictions, he says, make it easier for “things to feel lived in.”
  • The genre of torture porn is not really horror, because it mostly consists of people the audience hates getting killed in inventive ways for about 90 minutes. In other words, it’s not actually scary.
  • Numerous studio executives asked him if “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” was a working title. The network apparently wanted to change it to “Slayer” for years. I guess, had that happened, “Buffy” could have joined “and a Pizza Place.”
  • “I dislike revision, and I’ll tell you why. It’s more work.”
  • The first question from the audience was simply a request for a high-five. Joss gave the guy one. It was awesome.
  • Best question from the audience: “Why do the networks keep fucking with you?”
  • Joss’ answer to the best question, in brief: Networks have their own agenda and a business model to follow. Great content, by itself, will not sway them.
  • “Dollhouse” was about sex on a fundamental level (duh.) The network apparently asked him to take out the sex and replace it with shooting.

That was pretty much it. Then they quickly cleared people off of the hallway floor so that the multitudes of people coming out of the presentation room wouldn’t trample them.

Weather

Are You New to Texas?It’s cold and rainy and generally nasty. I only mention that so I have an excuse to use this Willy Wonka meme picture.

Remixes

I wandered a bit and came back to the same room (after concluding it would take too long to stand in line for coffee or food) for a talk called “Everything is a Remix, so Steal Like an Artist” (#SXREMIX on Twitter) with Austin Kleon and Kirby Ferguson. I had not heard of either of these guys before, but the subject sounded interesting, and it was.

They said that their goal for the presentation was to “demystify creativity.” Kirby says that “all artists spend their formative years doing derivative work.” After copying for some time, we create art through transformation. Edison, as but one example, didn’t invent the light bulb. He improved on it & made it commercially viable.

They outlined the three basic elements of creativity: Copy, transform, combine.

If you only “combine” things, then you are not really putting your own voice into it. Kirby compares what that process creates to Frankenstein’s monster.

In a video presentation on influences in “Star Wars,” Kirby showed the influence of Joseph Campbell, Kurosawa, “The Searchers,” World War II films, and more.

“Creativity is not magic, Kirby says. Does it ruin “Star Wars” to see how much material George Lucas “stole?” In a sense, it may not make “Star Wars” itself more interesting, but it turns the film into a film history lesson.

“Nothing is completely original” – this just means we need to redefine “original.” “Original” could mean “new & exciting” as opposed to “unprecedented.”

“Halo effect” – people want to make something wholly new, but they shouldn’t have to. This could be viewed as empowering. Don’t worry too much about being derivative, just create.

Mythical idea of the “lone genius”: Film is a collaboration requiring collaboration. Terry Gilliam calls himself a filter for the ideas. God used to get all the credit for creativity. The Romantics (Lord Byron, et al) changed it to themselves alone, & we still have that idea. The lone genius idea tends to excuse bad behavior and frequently destroys young talent. It is more important, Austin said, to be a good human being than a good artist (Kirby sort of disagreed).

Most of us have no problem with copying as long as we’re the ones doing it.

On the difference between a “remix” and a “ripoff”: Remixes acknowledge the source material. Ripoffs pretend to be original. Austin says plagiarism and forgery are two sides of the same coin.

A final quote from Austin: “Imitation is only flattery if it’s any good.”

A Blogging Interlude

I had a bit of free time, so I headed back over to the Samsung Bloggers’ Lounge, where they unfortunately did not have any free food or coffee. Still, it offered a good, albeit crowded, place to sit down and write for a little while. It’s also a good place to strike up conversations with random people. Let me throw a little SEO love to the people I met today: there was a Chicago marketing consultant (Lon Taylor), a Los Angeles online live chat service provider (Ben Congleton), and a Houston mobile technology provider (the awesomely-named Paul Steel). I also finally got to meet Jen Wojcik in person. That was awesome. I forgot to mention that yesterday I finally met The Q in person too! It’s great to actually meet the Tweeters you follow.

Story Wars

Next up was “Winning the Story Wars” (@SXstorywars on Twitter), a reading by Jonah Sachs from his forthcoming book of the same name. It was very marketing-oriented, but offered some excellent pointers for storytelling in general, I think.

He first talked about how we began telling stories through oral tradition. This eventually led to the Broadcast Era, which in turn led to the “Digitoral” Era (don’t you just love marketing neologisms?)

There was discussion of Joseph Campbell, the second time I’d heard about him today! The ingredients of myth are explanation, meaning, story, and ritual. Religion, science, & entertainment can’t offer all four at the same time, but marketing can. (At this point I was a bit skeptical, but keep reading). He gave the example of the Marlboro Man: the Marlboro Man made it okay for men to smoke filtered cigarettes, which was an issue back in the day, and then became a major cultural icon. In other words, the myth and storytelling is not always a good thing for society, but I digress.

He then talked about the model of “freaks, cheats, and familiars,” and this was pretty interesting. People, by which he meant the human race, have existed in our current biological state for at least 70,000 years. Understanding how people thought 70,000 years ago, when times were presumably less complicated, helps us understand how people think today. Back then, people lived in small tribes, and they evolved to react to unfamiliar people, viewing them as either a threat or an opportunity. “Freaks” in a story grab people’s attention and draw them in.

Next, he addressed the “problem of altruism”: people have to both compete and cooperate to survive. Stories of “cheats” uphold cultural norms, because people want to see them punished. “Cheats” could also be used in a story to defy a cultural norm we hate.

As for “familiars,” stories are told in “tribes” that the marketer can’t control, so the story is encoded in a language or setting the audience will accept. This is sort of like the “everyman” character.

Then he read a story about Robert Oppenheimer and the Trinity test, which was interesting. That’s all I have in my notes.

A Carlin Home Companion

Kelly Carlin in "A Carlin Home Companion"I stuck around in the same room because I was intrigued by the next presentation. Kelly Carlin, daughter of George Carlin, presented a one-woman show about her father, “A Carlin Home Companion” (#SXcarlin on Twitter). It was amazing. George Carlin, in my humble opinion, was and remains one of the greatest comics of our era, and he was simply a great wit and intellect to boot. She tells a deeply personal and moving story of growing up in his home, watching the course of his career, from standard “Tonight Show” comic, to countercultural icon, to drug addict, to stand-up hero, and more. It is too personal a story for me to possibly do it justice as a summary here. I’ll leave it at a paraphrase of how she ended the show, saying of her father:

He had to give up who he thought he was supposed to be to become who he was meant to be.

Photo credits: ‘Madness!’ by imtheq on instagram; ‘Everything at SXSW involves waiting in line’, ‘Joss Whedon speaks! (via live feed)’, and ‘Kelly Carlin in “A Carlin Home Companion”‘ by wondermutt, on Flickr; Willy Wonka meme obtained here.

Share