You Live Here with Us

Photo by Kathy O'Cain via Facebook

Photo by Kathy O’Cain via Facebook

None of you understand. I’m not locked up in here with you. You’re locked up in here with me.
-Rorschach, Watchmen by Alan Moore

An interesting feature of the past week’s events in Texas is the seemingly genuine surprise, not only among Republican leaders, but rank-and-file “pro-life” supporters as well, that so many people care so deeply about this issue and will stand and oppose bills like SB5 and its zombie equivalents, HB2 and SB9.

After ten years of dominating all statewide elected offices and both chambers of the Legislature, I suspect that Republicans, and conservatives in general, began to think of it as their state, and that we progressives were stuck here with them. If you’ll pardon the Watchmen reference above, maybe it’s time for them to realize that Texas is our state, too, and it is time for conservatives to realize that they have to live in it with us.

Share

A Searing Look at the “Pro-Life” Movement from a Former Insider

Although I have been pro-choice for as long as I have known that this was an issue in dispute, I have always felt a certain sympathy for people who genuinely believe that “life begins at [whenever],” but my sympathy stops when they start trying to impose their views on others. Some people do not mince words, saying that because a fetus is a full human being, the rights of the mother cease to matter. Others simply claim to care deeply for the rights of the fetus, and to want to help the fetus survive. The problem is that nearly every other policy favored by the “pro-life” makes it as difficult as possible for the fetus to thrive once it becomes a baby (which, for the purposes of my argument, occurs at birth. Respect my opinions, dammit!) This is why many people, myself included, think the movement should be called “pro-birth,” rather than “pro-life,” because that is where their willingness to help ends.

Libby Anne, who blogs at Love,Joy, Feminism, has an excellent piece from last October about her shift from a vehement “pro-life” stance (scare quotes intentional) to being pro-choice. The whole thing deserves your attention, as she examines not only opposition to abortion among “pro-life” advocates, but also opposition to making birth control available, or even opposition to birth control at all. Contraception is generally agreed to be the best way to reduce the number of abortions, which I agree is a noble goal. By not encouraging contraceptive use, the “pro-life” movement does nothing to decrease the number of abortions, and reveals that for many, the true goal is controlling women’s sexuality.

[T]hose in the pro-life movement, or at least the leaders of the pro-life movement, are incredibly inconsistent. You simply can’t be against the pill for fear that it will result in flushed out zygotes and yet not concerned at all about the vastly greater number of zygotes flushed out naturally every day. At least, not if you really truly believe a zygote has the same worth as an infant, toddler, or adult, and not if you’re truly motivated solely by a desire to save the lives of these “unborn babies.” Fresh off of these thoughts, I came upon two news articles on the subject in the last week that have completely shattered the last bit of faith I had in the pro-life movement.

She then talks about how Obama, through health care reform, has reduced the number of abortions far more than a ban on abortion ever would. She concludes as follows:

The reality is that so-called pro-life movement is not about saving babies. It’s about regulating sex. That’s why they oppose birth control. That’s why they want to ban abortion even though doing so will simply drive women to have dangerous back alley abortions. That’s why they want to penalize women who take public assistance and then dare to have sex, leaving an exemption for those who become pregnant from rape. It’s not about babies. If it were about babies, they would be making access to birth control widespread and free and creating a comprehensive social safety net so that no woman finds herself with a pregnancy she can’t afford. They would be raising money for research on why half of all zygotes fail to implant and working to prevent miscarriages. It’s not about babies. It’s about controlling women. It’s about making sure they have consequences for having unapproved sex.

But I am very sure that there are other dupes out there. If you’re sitting there reading this thinking “but I really am in it to save unborn babies,” I am sure you’re not alone. After all, I was one of you.

If you are one who has been a part of the pro-life movement because you really do believe in “saving unborn babies,” it’s time to cut your ties with the movement. You may be an honest and kind-hearted person, but you’ve been had. You’ve been taken in. It’s time to let go. It’s time to support Obamacare’s birth control mandate, it’s time to call off opposition to birth control, and it’s time to get behind progressive programs that help provide for poor women and their children. It’s time to make your actions consistent with your motives. While I am myself no longer morally opposed to abortion, I and others like me share your desire to decrease the number of unplanned pregnancies and to ensure that every woman can afford the option of keeping her pregnancy.

We’d love to have you join us.

Share

This is Why We Need Freedom From Religion

A Pennsylvania Republican state representative in Pennsylvania blocked a Democratic representative from speaking on the floor of the House, citing “God’s law” (h/t Jason). Rep. Brian Sims, a Democrat and the first openly-gay Pennsylvania state legislator, wanted to speak about the U.S. Supreme Court’s DOMA ruling during a time when “legislators can speak of uncontroversial issues.” It requires the unanimous consent of the other House members, so one legislator can stop anyone from speaking.

A tale of two legislators: Brian Sims on the left; Daryl Metcalfe on the right (see what I did there?)

A tale of two legislators: Brian Sims on the left; Daryl Metcalfe on the right (see what I did there?)

Someone, or several someone’s, objected to what Sims intended to say. The Republican Speaker of the House, Sam Smith, declined to reveal who objected. In the midst of the hubbub, Republican Rep. Daryl Metcalfe decided to take credit for blocking Sims from speaking, although it is apparently still not clear if he raised the original objection. I’m not too clear on how this procedural rule works, so I don’t know if Metcalfe, or anyone else objecting, needed to give a reason for objecting, but oh boy, did Metcalfe ever give a reason: Continue reading

Share

How Have Texas Republicans Been Abusing Their Power Lately?

When liberal fascists form a mob, they do so in an orderly, color-coordinated fashion. (© @OFA_UT/Twitter)

When liberal fascists form a mob, they do so in an orderly, color-coordinated fashion. (© @OFA_UT/Twitter)

We’ve all heard about how an “unruly mob” disrupted the Texas Senate last week, and how all the beleaguered rich white dudes were scared. We’ve also heard how someone allegedly doctored the voting records to make it look like the vote on SB5 took place before midnight on June 25, when in fact it occurred after midnight on June 26 (and therefore after the expiration of the Legislature’s special session.)

One of these is a group of citizens making noise for about ten minutes inside a public building to express discontent with some pretty shady legislative practices. The other is felony falsification of public documents. Which one do you think state Republican leaders are choosing to make an issue? Continue reading

Share

Monday Morning Cute: The Pangolin

The pangolin is like a pinecone you sort of want to hug.

ixTXhvs

Via imgur.com

tumblr_mh819q6U1Y1s3ea5ho1_250

Via tumblr.com

Although at times, they can look like they’re up to no good:

tumblr_m3vfrgAsC11qg9hmto1_500

Via tumblr.com

In a pinch, you can dress your dog up like a pangolin:

© Sarah Pappin/pangolins.org, via john-christian-s.tumblr.com

© Sarah Pappin/pangolins.org, via john-christian-s.tumblr.com

Share

Update on the Anti-Abortion Bills Coming Up in Texas’ Second Special Session (Courtesy of Karen)

1045115_10103126386872565_1531030081_nThe following was written by my new friend Karen, and should replace the information I posted last week. I am editing that post so that it directs readers here. After this sentence, everything else is Karen’s words.

I’ve been waiting for the text of HB2 to come available to amend this fully, but it continues to be unavailable (probably intentional). In any event, I’ve added links to the new bills, and made SOME amendments based on information we have received regarding SB9. IMPORTANT TO READ THE PART ABOUT SB9 (see section c.) because it has significant changes from the previous bill and makes previous arguments no longer valid. If you can get the word out about the changes (as much as possible, I know the ship has sailed to a certain extent), it would be GREAT.

When you go to this protest on Monday, PLEASE be informed and know the facts. Some of the media will attempt to make you look as stupid as possible, as if women are hysterical, emotional and totally unreasonable. As emotional an issue as this is for many of us, people are more apt to listen and take you seriously if you remain calm and logical in your arguments.

READ THE ACTUAL BILLS (if you haven’t already) http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/831/billtext/html/SB00005H.htm
NOTE: this is the OLD bill. There is now SB9 and HB2.
The text of SB9 is available http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=832&Bill=SB9
The text of HB2 has not been made available yet http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=832&Bill=HB2

Beat the supporters of these bills at their own game and have your arguments ready as to why this bill is damaging to women. Continue reading

Share

The Complacency of the Texas Conservative

“It must have been a rude shock for [Lt. Governor David Dewhurst] that people were paying attention … He hasn’t seen participatory democracy in a really long time.”
Cecile Richards

After ten years of holding all major statewide offices and both houses of the Legislature, Texas Republicans seem to have forgotten what it’s like to face direct disagreement.

The next thirty days are going to be very interesting.

Share

SIGNAL BOOST: The Context of the “Unruly Mob”

History is often written by whoever gets their story out the earliest, repeats it most often, and says it the loudest. Republicans will try to make the night of June 25, 2013 a story of an “unruly mob” who disrupted the democratic process. Anyone watching Tuesday night knows that this is a lie, but Republicans know that repeating a lie enough times makes it the truth (cf. Swift Boat, Benghazi, IRS, etc.)

We have to be the authors of history on this one, and truth is on our side. They’re going to try to pass this bill again. They have the numbers to do it. We have the power to make it clear that they had to break the rules—and the law—to get SB5 passed.

Texas Rep. Donna Howard posted this on her Facebook page with the following note (h/t Jennifer): “I want to emphasize the comments from someone who posted on my page because it gives you a perspective that is not necessarily being conveyed by the media and certainly not by the Republicans.” The comment is from Kathy Kennemer Genet (paragraph breaks added for ease of reading):

For the last day, I have glad to have been known as a member of the Unruly Mob at the capitol. But I want to straighten out a misconception about what happened in the Senate Chamber on Tuesday, and on Monday, and in the House Chamber on Sunday.

I was fortunate to be a witness in the galleries those days. Each day I was there, the leaders in those rooms, and the leaders of the groups organizing us made it crystal clear that we had to respect the rules of decorum there. We were shushed if we clapped, or spoke out in any way. We were prohibited from any expressions, including silent “jazz hands” during the proceedings.

The threat was that after being warned from the floor, if even one of us spoke out, the whole gallery would be cleared. Our job each time was to be a silent witness and a silent support for our legislators doing their work. Occasionally, a new spectator was allowed into the gallery, and if they yelled out, dozens of us quickly got them quiet and told them not to do it again.

I saw many of the same faces day after day in the chambers. We listened to things that made us sad, and happy, and angry and proud. We watched our legislators doing their work and hoped they got some support from our witness and our presence. We silently watched Sen. Davis’s tireless filibuster and the good work of the Senators supporting her for over 12 hours.

In the last half hour, as procedural rules were ignored and broken so that the vote could happen against the law, Senator Letcia Van de Putte, said these words: “At what point does a female Senator raise her hand or her voice to be recognized over the male colleagues in the room?” At that moment hours and days of decorum did break, but they broke as a civic duty to halt what should have been halted legally, through the rules of the Texas State Senate. We were the last wall, and all the anger, and frustration and emotion poured out.

We responded to the rule of law being broken right in front of us. And this time our legislators from the Senate, and from the Texas House of Representatives who had come into the Senate chambers, looked up at us and smiled and held up two fingers which meant a NO vote. And we held up two fingers and yelled until our ears rang. The troopers were leading people out, and as the gallery emptied to 2/3, the sound got louder.

I have never been more proud to raise my voice and I would have happily been arrested for that right. We were not an unruly mob in the gallery despite what Lt. Gov. Dewhurst says. In this way, as in countless others that night, he is wrong.

Share

If You’re Planning on Joining the Next Round of SB5 Protests, Take Heed (UPDATED)

UPDATE (06/30/2013): Karen has been kind enough to update her research, which I have put in a new post. Please direct your attention there instead of her for more up-to-date information. Continue reading

Share

This Week in WTF, June 28, 2013

0funny-dog-pictures-wtfThis was quite a week. Not much can top the shenanigans at the Texas Capitol, but here are a few WTFs to get your blood boiling anew.

– This headline says it all: “Bigoted Gun-Nuts Create Pork-Tipped Bullets to Send Muslims ‘To Hell.'” They allegedly sell ammo coated “with a special ballistic paint infused with pork to make it ‘Haraam’ or unclean to a radical Jihadist.” As AATP points out in their article, these idiots “don’t seem to understand that the penalty mentioned in the Qur’an is meant for those who voluntarily consume pork, not get shot with pig-infused paint covered bullets.”

– A woman in Georgia noticed that her birth certificate erroneously listed her gender as male. This proved to be a problem when she went to renew her driver’s license, at the age of 37, and was required to prove that she was, in fact, female. According to The Raw Story, the Georgia Department of Driver Services required her to undergo a pelvic exam and get a doctor’s note. Yes, a doctor’s note saying she’s a woman. The state’s Vital Record Service, who must have hired all the smart people, said that requiring the test violated protocol, and confirmed her gender (again) by checking her son’s birth certificate.

– Back in Texas, this shit happened:


That’s all I came up with this week. I was kinda busy.

Photo credit: Via bellaescritor.com.

Share