You Will Never Be as Awesome as Christopher Lee

Nowadays, most people know Christopher Lee as Saruman the White or Count Dooku. He was awesome as Saruman, but since I generally prefer to pretend that the Star Wars prequel trilogy never happened, I shall withhold opinion on Count Dooku. He’s also one-third of the triumvirate of what I call the awesome old horror actors, the others being Peter Cushing and Vincent Price. (He’s also the only one of the three to live to see the new millennium.)

As this infographic shows, Christopher Lee’s badassery runs deep (h/t Marc): Continue reading

Share

A Southern-Style Notpology

By Ludovic Bertron from New York City, Usa (Nottoway Plantation  Uploaded by russavia) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia CommonsI’ve been sick for all of 2014 up to this point, so missed several stories I thought to blog about but lacked the energy—so I’ll blog about them now. Probably everyone with any interest in the topic has seen or heard about Ani DiFranco’s now-cancelled retreat at a refurbished slave plantation in Louisiana. There isn’t much I can say about it that hasn’t been said by people with far greater wisdom than experience than I, and that’s really the point. The only advice I can give to anyone in this sort of situation is to stop talking and listen.

Once it became clear that this was an epic f***up, Ani Difranco offered a notpology on Facebook, followed by a somewhat better apology, but by then the damage was done. There is literally nothing anyone can say about a spruced-up concentration camp on the banks of the Mississippi that would make it anything other than a spruced-up concentration camp. Multiple commentators have drawn a comparison to Dachau—say what you will about the historical parallels, but at least Dachau is honest about its past.

To learn more about the Nottoway Plantation and exactly why this was all such a terrible idea, read Ani DiFranco’s Epic Fail: Reflections on Nottoway Plantation by Adele M. Stan. Stan also tweeted an excellent question:


To learn more about the legacy of slavery in Louisiana, read Lamar White, Jr.’s Why “12 Years a Slave” Will Always Matter to Louisiana.

For a broader understanding of racial issues in feminism, read Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color (JSTOR registration required) by Kimberle Crenshaw, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 6 (Jul., 1991).

Here are other posts I’ve found dealing with the issue: Continue reading

Share

Historical Illiteracy

The brouhaha over that Duck Dynasty guy losing one public forum to spew ignorance has really brought out the wacky (h/t BooMan):

Embattled “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson has been suspended from his show by A&E for his remarks about gays and African-Americans, and now some high-profile conservatives are rallying to his side and defending him. On Friday, GOP congressional candidate Ian Bayne went all in, comparing Robertson to civil rights icon Rosa Parks.

“In December 1955, Rosa Parks took a stand against an unjust societal persecution of black people, and in December 2013, Robertson took a stand against persecution of Christians,” Bayne said in an email to supporters.

“What Parks did was courageous,” he added. “What Mr. Robertson did was courageous too.”

This is so beyond the realm of the merely stupid that it makes me sad. Continue reading

Share

Remembering That Other European Mass-Murdering Despot

Monument \'e0 L\'e9opold II King Leopold II of Belgium, to phrase it in an understated fashion, was not a good person. It is important to remember that (h/t Erik Loomis):

Today [December 17] is the 104th anniversary of the death of Belgium’s King Leopold II. The book [Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness] made me loathe this greedy man who was, like many Kings of his era, a spoiled, insecure and violent maniac. Belgium, unlike its neighbors, didn’t control many colonies. Of course, Leopold thought, how could a country be influential if it didn’t have darker peoples under its boot (It should be noted, however, that Leopold’s invasion of the Congo started off as a personal investment, which makes it even more heinous). The despot’s nefarious forces, dubbed the Force Publique, invaded the Congo Free State and unleashed a horror many of us can’t even fathom. The invaders raped Congolese women, destroyed homes and villages, sucked vital resources rubber and ivory) from the country and, more infamously as shown above [I used a different picture -CP], cut off the hands of native peoples to intimidate those who didn’t produce enough rubber to meet the quota or to show military superiors that bullets hadn’t been wasted on, gasp–wait for it, animals. Those beautiful black hands, by the way, are still a presence in Belgium. I was in Brussels several years ago and a candy shop, near the European Commission’s headquarters, was selling chocolate hands. No other customer seemed to recognize the odious irony of it all. But, then again, that’s Europe for you: a lovely and historically rich continent spectacularly ignorant of its role in multiple genocides. Continue reading

Share

Mandela and Marxism

South Africa The Good News / www.sagoodnews.co.za [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia CommonsLast week, we learned of the passing of Nelson Mandela, who may rank closest to a true hero that the human race has had in living memory. Alas, we also endured a litany of complaints from those for whom any association with the communism of the 1950 and 60’s is enough to taint a person forever.

This post at Booman Tribune captures the problem of applying our Western, especially our American, perspective to Mandela’s struggle. BooMan first offers Mandela’s own words, from his famous “I am prepared to die” speech delivered from the dock on April 20, 1964:

It is perhaps difficult for white South Africans, with an ingrained prejudice against communism, to understand why experienced African politicians so readily accept communists as their friends. But to us the reason is obvious. Theoretical differences, amongst those fighting against oppression, is a luxury which cannot be afforded. What is more, for many decades communists were the only political group in South Africa who were prepared to treat Africans as human beings and as their equals; who were prepared to eat with us; talk with us, live with us, and work with us. They were the only political group which was prepared to work with the Africans for the attainment of political rights and a stake in society. Because of this, there are many Africans who today tend to equate freedom with communism. They are supported in this belief by a legislature which brands all exponents of democratic government and African freedom as communists and bannned many of them, who are not communists, under the Suppression of Communism Act. Although My Lord I am not a communist and I have never been a member of the Communist Party, I myself have been banned, have been named under that pernicious Act because of the role I played in the Defiance Campaign. I have also been banned and convicted under that Act.

It is not only in internal politics that we count communists as amongst those who support our cause. In the international field, communist countries have always come to our aid. In the United Nations and other Councils of the world the communist bloc has supported the Afro-Asian struggle against colonialism and often seems to be more sympathetic to our plight than some of the Western powers. Although there is a universal condemnation of apartheid, the communist bloc speaks out against it with a louder voice than most of the western world. In these circumstances, it would take a brash young politician, such as I was in 1949, to proclaim that the Communists are our enemies.

*** Continue reading

Share

My Take on “Abolitionist Porn”

SlavesForSaleNewOrleans1861John Derbyshire and I have something in common: I haven’t seen the movie 12 Years a Slave, either. I suspect that is where our similarities end, though.

If you are not familiar with Derbyshire’s work, the National Review fired him last year, essentially for being too much of a racist hack. That should really speak volumes. I’m not going to waste any significant time or bandwidth on Derbyshire’s rantings about 12 Years a Slave, except to summarize that he has identified a genre he calls “abolitionist porn” that overstates how bad slavery was. For some good takedowns of his hackery, see Brian Tashman, Ed Brayton, and PZ Myers.

We do have one additional, very superficial, similarity that I might mention. Derbyshire concludes his “abolitionist porn” screed with a statement that, minus the specific context, I find to be valid and truthful:

In the matter of slavery, though, I already feel sure that the shallow good North, bad South simplicities of Abolitionist Porn and popular perception bear little relation to the thorny tangles of reality.

I suspect that Derbyshire is trying to say that the South wasn’t really that bad, and that’s where I strongly dissent. I would instead posit that the North, applying the standards of today, wasn’t really that good. Continue reading

Share

The Civil War Really Was About Slavery. Who Knew?

Out of a snarky Twitter exchange, a small research project was born. A fellow who tweets under the name @defendheritage tweeted the following:

…which led to an appropriately snarky response from JC Christian:

That got me thinking about how people try to say the Civil War was about almost anything except slavery. The most common alternative rationale for the Civil War is “states’ rights [to allow slavery],” which I took the liberty of amending just now. Continue reading

Share

If It Weren’t for You Meddling Kids!!!

Several of our Founding Fathers were barely out of their teens when the Declaration of Independence was signed, according to the Journal of the American Revolution. Some of them were still teenagers, actually:

Marquis de Lafayette, 18
James Monroe, 18
Gilbert Stuart, 20
Aaron Burr, 20
Alexander Hamilton, 21
Betsy Ross, 24
James Madison, 25

This sort of puts General Cornwallis‘ surrender at Yorktown in 1781 into a new perspective, doesn’t it? (Cornwallis was 42 years old at the time.)

"And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids!" (Via tvtropes.org)

“And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren’t for you meddling kids!” (Via tvtropes.org)

Share

This Week in WTF, July 5, 2013

Once again, nothing much tops the shenanigans of the Texas Capitol this week when it comes to WTF, but here are a few stories that I caught.

– First up, an awesome story: Christina Stephens, who lost her left leg in a “foot crush injury,” has built a prosthetic limb for herself out of LEGO bricks.

National Park Service [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

National Park Service [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

– Tulsa, Oklahoma is considering a bid to host the 2024 Summer Olympics, which Deadspin calls “adorable.” What makes it WTF-worthy is that the city is reportedly using the Trail of Tears in its bid, as a selling point.

In a nod to the state’s American Indian history, the Olympic torch would be led along the solemn Trail of Tears, not far from where field hockey would be played in Tahlequah.

Just to bring you up to speed on that bit of American history, here’s what the National Park Service has to say about it:

In 1838, the United States government forcibly removed more than 16,000 Cherokee Indian people from their homelands in Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina, and Georgia, and sent them to Indian Territory (today known as Oklahoma).

The impact to the Cherokee was devastating. Hundreds of Cherokee died during their trip west, and thousands more perished from the consequences of relocation. This tragic chapter in American and Cherokee history became known as the Trail of Tears, and culminated the implementation of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which mandated the removal of all American Indian tribes east of the Mississippi River to lands in the West.

And there’s this from PBS:

The Cherokee, on the other hand, were tricked with an illegitimate treaty. In 1833, a small faction agreed to sign a removal agreement: the Treaty of New Echota. The leaders of this group were not the recognized leaders of the Cherokee nation, and over 15,000 Cherokees — led by Chief John Ross — signed a petition in protest. The Supreme Court ignored their demands and ratified the treaty in 1836. The Cherokee were given two years to migrate voluntarily, at the end of which time they would be forcibly removed. By 1838 only 2,000 had migrated; 16,000 remained on their land. The U.S. government sent in 7,000 troops, who forced the Cherokees into stockades at bayonet point. They were not allowed time to gather their belongings, and as they left, whites looted their homes. Then began the march known as the Trail of Tears, in which 4,000 Cherokee people died of cold, hunger, and disease on their way to the western lands.

This kind of puts the 1996 Atlanta Summer Olympics in a different perspective.

– A Belgian diplomat and his wife apparently found themselves at the center of a terrorism investigation, of sorts, after she tried to breastfeed their baby in a posh country club while in possession of a black backpack. Accounts differ over what exactly happened, but a police officer allegedly told the woman, “In Sri Lanka, babies are used by terrorists…You have to understand, this club has had terrorism threats in the past.” So babies are precious gifts and terrorist accoutrements, I guess.

Photo credit: National Park Service [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.

Share

The Original Caucasians

800px-Kezenoy-lake

Lake Kezenoyam, in Chechnya

The Boston Marathon bombings, or whatever historical name we decide to apply to the event, showed Americans at their best and their not-quite-worst. Despite the heroism and selflessness displayed by people at the event, other people, all of whom did not experience the incident directly, rushed in to cast a wide net of blame, mostly directed at Muslims. The most interesting take on this, to me, was David Sirota’s April 16 piece in Salon, “Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American.” The context of his piece, to me, was not so much an actual wish to implicate white, right-leaning Americans in the bombing, but rather an observation of how we deal differently with crimes committed by white people and non-white people:

[I]n the context of terrorist attacks,…white non-Islamic terrorists are typically portrayed not as representative of whole groups or ideologies, but as “lone wolf” threats to be dealt with as isolated law enforcement matters. Meanwhile, non-white or developing-world terrorism suspects are often reflexively portrayed as representative of larger conspiracies, ideologies and religions that must be dealt with as systemic threats — the kind potentially requiring everything from law enforcement action to military operations to civil liberties legislation to foreign policy shifts.

In other words, if the bomber(s) turned out to be white people, the aftermath would likely consist mostly of criminal investigations and prosecutions, rather than a nationwide panic reaction like the one that birthed the PATRIOT Act and the war in Iraq. Of course, some people are determined to read the worst possible interpretation into such a statement, and Sirota unfortunately used words that others could shape into “ghoulish race-baiting.” I do not see much point in trying to engage with those who use terms like “race-baiting,” because I doubt anything I say would have an effect (especially considering Sirota’s clarifications and further thoughts on the matter here, here, and here.).

The revelation that the bombing suspects (remember, there has been no conviction, so they remain alleged bombers) are originally from Chechnya has thrown a wrench into everyone’s reflexive discussion of race and ethnicity as it pertains to terrorism and national security. Yes, they’re Muslims, but they’re also literally Caucasian. This has led to some interesting (I use that term broadly) discussion of what exactly it means to be “white” and whether or not we can continue to profile Muslims as a group in any sort of efficient manner. It might not have stopped the invective of some on the right towards immigrants in general and the basic rights of criminal suspects, but it has at least brought a strange sort of nuance to the discussion among some. At the very least, it gives Americans an opportunity to learn something about an unfamiliar part of the world.

This raised two questions for me: (1) is being a Caucasian from the Caucasus at all the same as being Caucasian in the sense of being white? and (2) does it make even a smidgen of difference when it comes to questions of national security or anti-terrorism?

The answers, for those who want to stop reading at the end of this sentence are: (1) no, but it’s interesting and worthy of further exploration; and (2) no, but given the amount of right-wing terrorism associated with white nationalism in this country, along with anti-Muslim rhetoric, people on the right have no business acting offended all of a sudden. Continue reading

Share