What I’m Reading, April 25, 2014

By Robin klein (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia CommonsPut Your Money Where Your Mouth Is, evolved beyond the fist mistermix, Balloon Juice, April 19, 2014

The Will/Krauthammer justification for unlimited campaign contributions is that it is free speech protected by the Constitution, and it’s just a happy coincidence that the political party they back has more money to spend on political donations. Now that they’ve installed a Supreme Court that agrees with them, they’re trying to turn the reasonable consequences of free speech into some form of persecution.

Hellraiser vs. The Hellbound Heart, Mark Pellegrini, Adventures in Poor Taste, October 12, 2012

Personally, I prefer Hellraiser over The Hellbound Heart just as I prefer Candyman over The Forbidden; I found it took all the elements I enjoyed from the story and improved upon them. However, there were a couple of items from the book which I either liked better or thought added a bit more to the story. In the book, when Frank summons the Cenobites, they make him feel every orgasm he’s ever had in his entire life all at once before tearing him to pieces (as opposed to the movie, where they just eviscerate Frank as soon as they arrive). This was important to the plot in that the spillage of Frank’s semen acted as a catalyst to his resurrection when Raury/Larry spilled his blood in the attic. Additionally, this version better represented the “pleasure and pain unified” concept which the Cenobites are supposed to embody. I suppose the only other detail from the book which I wish had made it into the film is what happened after Kirsty made her deal with the Cenobites. In the book, they give her a time limit and as each minute passes she can feel an invisible “noose” squeeze tighter around her neck. This added a bit of suspense to the climax, as Kirsty struggles to get Frank to verbally admit to his escape from Hell.

Technically, this is from “Hellraiser 2,” but shut up.

Continue reading

Share

The Super Bowl is Today, So It’s Time for Another Round of Moral Panic

"Super Bowl XLVIII Preparations at MetLife Stadium January 31, 2014" by Anthony Quintano [CC BY 2.0, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/)], via FlickrEverybody knows that the Super Bowl is the single biggest day of the year for human sex trafficking in the United States. Well, everybody who doesn’t do any research about it at all, anyway.

In all seriousness, I really shouldn’t have to say either of the following two statements, but here goes:

  1. People who engage in human trafficking of any kind, be it for sex work, agricultural work, textile work, and so forth, are the scum of the earth and deserve to be thrown into a very dark pit full of spiders.
  2. No evidence exists to support assertions that the [Super Bowl, World Cup, Olympics, etc.] draws a massive influx of trafficking victims (which seems to have become synonymous at times with sex trafficking victims.)

In 2011, when Dallas hosted the Super Bowl, people predicted that tens of thousands of children, “some as young as 12 years old,” would be in the city specifically for the Super Bowl. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott even managed to get in a dig at Mexico: “Super Bowl XLV on Sunday in Cowboys Stadium is of particular concern because of Texas’ 1,200-mile border with Mexico, which makes the state a bigger target for international rings, says Abbott, the attorney general.” Here’s the thing, though: there was no evidence to support those predictions, and no evidence that such a massive influx of traffickers and trafficking victims actually took place. It happened, no doubt, but it is unlikely that it happened at any greater rate than during other weekends.

This is an odd issue, because it is one of the few where some people on the right and left are united, in a sense, albeit for different reasons. On the right, you have the usual squeamishness about sex, women, and so forth. It doesn’t surprise me when right-wing news sources parrot the conventional, albeit unsupported, wisdom. On the left, you have obviously valid concern over people’s well-being, but it is often taken to an extent far, far beyond the evidence.

Several serious problems present themselves with this particular myth. For one, little to no effort is made to differentiate people who are forced into sex work against their will from people who engage in it voluntarily, whether from economic necessity or actual enjoyment. (For my part, I think consensual sex work by adults should be decriminalized (PDF file), but that’s an issue for another blog post.)

Second, the rhetoric places almost exclusive emphasis on juvenile female sex workers, to the exclusion of male and transgender sex trafficking victims and victims of trafficking in any other area. This makes the work of stopping actual trafficking more difficult, but don’t take my word for it. Rachel Lloyd from  Girls Educational and Mentoring Services (GEMS) offers three reasons why the Super Bowl myth harms the effort to help trafficking victims: credibility (the claim gets so overblown that it obscures the truth), false alarms (see “The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf”), and limited resources (if you throw everything into Super Bowl weekend, you have little left for the rest of the year.)

You want an example of misuse of limited resources? How about this: Continue reading

Share