“We would never condone raising funds for cancer research in this manner.”

An interesting twist in the ongoing debacle of the stolen/hacked nude celebrity photos is the effort by various people on the sub-Reddit known as the “Fappening” (a word I promise to use as little as possible) to raise money for prostate cancer research. Get it? A bunch of dudes doing, uh, dude stuff in front of their computers raising money for research into cancer of dude parts? It’s apparently funny to the sort of people who think any of this is a good idea.

Well, the Prostate Cancer Foundation isn’t laughing, nor is it accepting their donations:

The Prostate Cancer Foundation returned all money donated via a post on the website Reddit that was designed to make a joke about leaked naked images of Jennifer Lawrence and a slew of other famous women hacked from the women’s Apple iCloud accounts.

“We would never condone raising funds for cancer research in this manner. Out of respect for everyone involved and in keeping with our own standards, we are returning all donations that resulted from this post,” the foundation said in a statement Tuesday.

The dudebros on Reddit are now all butthurt about it. Good.

Share

I’ll Never Understand Some People’s Idea of “Art” (UPDATED)

I really do believe that some people mistake edginess, abrasiveness, or plain old controversy for “art.”

The recently leaked private images of Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton, among others, are set to be printed onto life-sized canvases and exhibited at an upcoming event held in Los Angeles.

Cory Allen Contemporary Art (CACA) has announced that the works will be among the new additions to artist XVALA’s “Fear Google” concept.

They are set to be displayed at his upcoming exhibition, named “No Delete”, at the CACA’s space The Showroom in Saint Petersburg, Florida.

The artist’s publicist, Cory Allen, said in a statement: “XVALA appropriating celebrity compromised images and the overall ‘Fear Google’ campaign has helped strengthen the ongoing debate over privacy in the digital era.

“The commentary behind this show is a reflection of who we are today. We all become ‘users’ and in the end, we become ‘used.'”

That’s quite a bold statement for an artist who uses a pseudonym and speaks through a publicist. I had never heard of XVALA before I saw this article, and I already hate them.

I thought this article was satire at first, initially because of the subject matter, and then because the promoter goes by the name CACA.

I am perfectly willing to accept that no one person gets to define “art,” and that any single piece of art will mean 50 different things to 40 different people. What I do not accept, however, is that displaying stolen, intimate photographs of people without their permission is any less a grotesque invasion of privacy if you add some pretentious artiste-speak to it, than if it was posted anonymously to 4Chan.

“In today’s culture, everybody wants to know everything about everybody. An individual’s privacy has become everyone else’s business,” XVALA added. “It has become cash for cache.”

Shut the hell up.

UPDATE (09/07/2014): Anne Laurie at Balloon Juice named XVALA “Douchecanoe of the Week,” and the description made it into his Wikipedia page. Well done, internet.

Share

What Were You Thinking???

You might have missed the news, but Home Depot is investigating a possibly-massive security breach that may have compromised the financial information of people who shopped at one of their stores from May through August of this year. Last year’s breach of Target’s computers was one of the biggest cybersecurity breaches in history, affecting around 40 million customers. This one might be bigger.

Last month, Albertson’s was hacked. CNN Money is now keeping a list of businesses where your financial data might have been compromised.

Yet no one blames consumers, first and foremost, for putting their personal financial data out there online. Just sayin’.

Share

Don’t Dangle Raw Meat in Front of a Badger

(The following is adapted from a comment I made on Facebook, in response to the argument that the hacked nude photos debacle is analogous to leaving one’s wallet hanging out and having it stolen. It briefly involves badgers.)

By Gary M. Stolz, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Ah yes, a version of the “don’t dangle raw meat in front of a badger” argument. How is putting something online different from leaving cash hanging out of your wallet? Taking the cash requires little to no skill, just a willingness to steal something from someone. Hacking someone’s phone or computer, or even a cloud account, requires much more concerted effort. (Yes, yes, I know it’s easy for some people, but no one is born with hacking skill—they still have to learn how to hack, then make the decision to do so.) Nothing was left “in plain view,” as your analogy would require.

(By the way, I’ve heard the “don’t leave cash hanging out of your wallet” argument applied many, many times to women who get sexually assaulted while wearing short skirts, just so you know the rhetorical company you are keeping.)

Since we are possibly talking about hacks that occurred in the “cloud,” a better analogy would be a locker, or even a safety deposit box. One of the top cloud-storage companies is even called “Dropbox.” We’re not talking about people who left nude pictures of themselves in plain view of the whole world. Several of them had already deleted them, and the rest stored them places that, we have been repeatedly assured, are secure. In fact, we’ve learned that a well-known flaw in iCloud security might have been involved (and by “well-known,” I mean well-known to computer security professionals, not celebrities who happen to own iPhones.) [Ed.: Apple is claiming that iCloud was not hacked, but that multiple individual celebrities’ accounts may have been hacked.] If you want to argue that what happened here is somehow to be expected, then you have no cause for complaint if someone cuts the lock off of your locker at the gym, steals your wallet and your phone, and gym management asks why on earth you would carry your wallet around with you outside of your home.

That only scratches the surface of why your analogy is flawed, but I’ll stop there to give you time to catch up.

(I could go on from there about how people ≠ badgers, but this is good for now.)


Photo credit: By Gary M. Stolz, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.

Share