Always behind the times.
The chair of a House of Lords committee looking at drones was "horrified" when she recently discovered Google Maps pic.twitter.com/ic9Ronu0d6
— Matt Burgess (@mattburgess1) October 20, 2014
Always behind the times.
The chair of a House of Lords committee looking at drones was "horrified" when she recently discovered Google Maps pic.twitter.com/ic9Ronu0d6
— Matt Burgess (@mattburgess1) October 20, 2014
Meet Florence Colgate. She is an 18 year-old resident of Deal, Kent, England, the equivalent of a high school senior. She might be the most beautiful woman in the world, according to both “science” and Gawker editor Neetzan Zimmerman.
Zimmerman made this declaration because, apparently, Zimmerman does not know how to read. “Science” may have been misquoted, as it was probably too busy with things like the Large Hadron Collider to worry about who is the fairest of them all.
Now, Colgate is a phenomenally attractive young woman. Almost into the realm of otherworldliness, if photographs are to be believed. I’m also sure she is a very nice person. She’s getting hate on her Facebook page that she doesn’t deserve. But really, the whole world? Doesn’t picking a blond, blue-eyed, English girl as the most beautiful woman on all of planet Earth seem a bit convenient?
I’ll set aside the questions of the various racial and gender implications of this selection, because others can undoubtedly address those issues with greater knowledge than I ever could. I would instead like to address the undue violence that this story has done to the concepts of journalism and science. Continue reading