What I’m Reading, May 7, 2014

By California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation [Public domain], via Wikimedia CommonsU.N. Human Rights Chief: Stop Lethal Injection in U.S., Noa Yachot, ACLU Blog of Rights, May 2, 2014

The pain and suffering of Clayton Lockett during his gruesome execution in Oklahoma this week has been met with outrage around the world. Today the United Nations human rights chief said that Lockett’s botched execution may violate international law, and called for an immediate moratorium on the administration of the death penalty across the United States.

Should scientists ‘Jurassic-Park’ extinct species back to life? John D. Sutter, CNN, May 2, 2014 Continue reading

Share

Just Because You Think the Second Amendment Says You Can, It Still Doesn’t Mean You Should

By Lucio Eastman (Free State Project - PorcFest 2009 - Open Carry) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia CommonsYou might have a Second Amendment right to carry a gun into a restaurant, but others also have the right to call the police on you. I certainly have the right to state my opinion that you are a jackass. The following happened in Fort Worth

Let’s all take a moment to pity Open Carry Texas. The armed freaks who enjoy parading around terrorizing the public because they can are once again playing up their victim status after frightening the staff of a restaurant so badly that employees locked themselves in a freezer to protect themselves.

Thursday night, the “peaceful” and “non-threatening” group barged into a Jack in the Box with their usual heavy armaments, striking fear into the staff.

On multiple occasions in the past couple of years, I have heard people explain the difference between carrying a rifle in a manner in which it cannot be easily fired, as though this somehow makes it better that someone decided to stroll down the street with his definitely-not-for-hunting rifle (and I say “he” because it seems like it’s always a “he.”)

What is never explained is why I should trust the guy standing there with an arm cannon that is not in a firing position, simply because at that precise moment he isn’t holding it in a way that it could be fired. I know it doesn’t take long to move it into such a position—it wouldn’t be very useful otherwise—and that makes it impossible to tell the difference between a “good guy with a gun” and a “bad guy.” Continue reading

Share

When the Baby Kicks

Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore has been in the news for his interesting take on freedom of religion under the First Amendment:

Speaking at the Pastor for Life Luncheon, which was sponsored by Pro-Life Mississippi, Chief Justice Roy Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court declared that the First Amendment only applies to Christians because “Buddha didn’t create us, Mohammed didn’t create us, it was the God of the Holy Scriptures” who created us.

“They didn’t bring the Koran over on the pilgrim ship,” he continued. “Let’s get real, let’s go back and learn our history. Let’s stop playing games.”

Thomas Gainsborough [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Yes, 21st-century America should totally take all of its cues from this cat.

He said something else interesting, though, that seems to have been largely overlooked:

Chief Justice Moore later defined “life” via Blackstone’s Law — a book that American lawyers have “sadly forgotten” — as beginning when “the baby kicks.” “Today,” he said, “our courts say it’s not alive ’til the head comes out.”

He is referring to the Commentaries on the Laws of England by William Blackstone, first published in 1766. I figured I’d see what Blackstone actually said about the issue, because that’s how I roll. In Book 1 (The Rights of Persons), Chapter 1 (Of the Absolute Rights of Individuals), Blackstone writes on pages 125-26: Continue reading

Share

What I’m Reading , May 6, 2014

jodylehigh [Public domain, CC0 1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en)], via PixabayPrison rape is not a form of poetic justice–it’s an actual crime–so stop cheering it on, Robyn Pennacchia, Death and Taxes, May 2, 2014

[C]heering on something like rape takes away from you as a person. Although yes, sometimes crimes are so horrific that our id takes over and we want nothing but horror and misery to come to the perpetrator. Trust me, I understand that. But we have these rules for a reason, we have the 8th amendment for a reason–and it doesn’t have as much to do with the rights of a prisoner as it does to protect us from becoming the kind of people that cheer on “cruel and unusual punishment.” We need to be better than that. We need to prevent our ids from taking over, or else we’ll end up becoming exactly what we despise.

Where’s The Next Alexander Fleming? Or Why Corporations Don’t Have Incentives to Create New Antibiotics. Echidne, Echidne of the Snakes, May 1, 2014 Continue reading

Share

It’s Not Just Crimea

By en:User:Aivazovsky [Public domain], via Wikimedia CommonsRussia isn’t just mucking about in Crimea. Foreign Affairs has an article reviewing the long-simmering conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, a region of Azerbaijan that wants to join Armenia (h/t Doug):

The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan started on the eve of the Soviet breakup, as ethnic Armenians in Azerbaijan’s province of Nagorno-Karabakh rallied to join Armenia. Moscow armed both sides and played them against each other, turning a local dispute over the status of a territory inhabited by 90,000 people into a regional war. For close to six years, the newly independent states of Armenia and Azerbaijan fought over the territory, leaving 30,000 dead and creating around a million new refugees. Eventually, Armenia was victorious, and it took control of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven other Azerbaijani districts. Continue reading

Share

A Prayer-less Year

CNN’s Belief Blog has the story of Ryan Bell, a pastor who decided to try being an atheist for a year. (This started back in January, but I just learned about it.) He lost his job at a church, and decided that the time was right for a “neat little intellectual experiment”:

“It’s like when you go to a movie and you suspend disbelief for three hours to get inside the story,” Bell said. “I’m suspending my belief in God to see what atheism is all about.”

It is commonplace for theists to make statements about atheists that suggest that they have either never spoken to an actual atheist, or weren’t really listening when they did. This guy seems to be reaching out, though, as the story continues:

He would interview atheists, attend gatherings of nonbelievers and read through the canon of skeptics: Friedrich Nietzsche, Baruch Spinoza, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, among others.

He has even started a blog called Year Without God. There was one piece from CNN’s post that caught my attention in particular, though regarding how he would live differently: Continue reading

Share

What I’m Reading, May 5, 2014

Paul T. [CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/)], via FlickrCreationists’ Neil deGrasse Tyson hysteria reaches fever pitch, Dan Arel, Salon, May 2, 2014

Not surprisingly AiG’s own Danny Faulkner, an astronomer by degree, but not in practice claims that if stars are being formed today that we do not need science to explain how because God has the ability to make such things happen on his own.

This kind of thinking is what stunts scientific growth in the US and around the world. Faulkner and those like him aren’t looking for natural answers to the amazing universe we inhabit and simply credit anything and everything to God. When science does make a massive discovery that happens to through a wrench in their faith based beliefs, they simply reject the science.

Saudi Arabia Clueless About Human Rights, Ed Brayton, Dispatches from the Culture War, May 1, 2014 Continue reading

Share

Mean-Girl-in-Chief

One might be tempted to hope that the recent invocation of the sacrament of baptism in defense of torture—which managed to anger the left and the right—heralds the end of America’s reigning mean girl’s moment in the sun.

I’m pessimistic enough, though, that I wouldn’t count on it. I like the way Robyn Pennacchia said it:

There’s something deeply unsettling about her, and it has very little to do with the fact that I disagree with her politically. There are people I disagree with firmly but could perhaps have a pleasant conversation with on a non-political subject. In fact, it’s something I try to do on the regular because I am not really comfortable with thinking anyone is completely terrible, because that makes me feel too hopeless. Sarah Palin is not one of those people. If she agreed with me on everything, she would still freak me out.

In her speech, Palin goes on about how they are our enemies, which means we should be able to do whatever to them. She then goes on to talk about her other enemies– “those clownish little Kumbaya-humming fairytale-inhaling liberals.” She has a lot of vitriol for people she perceives as being kind–and almost more for that reason, specifically, than any political position. Even the way she speaks of her God–as though she wants to use him as an instrument of punishment, as an instrument of her own vengeance. There are the people who are on her side, 100%, and everyone else is her enemy.

Where have I heard that last bit before?

Oh yeah. Cersei Lannister.

20140429-221801.jpg

Eek.

Share

Monday Morning Cute: Puppy Love

A baby elephant is called a “calf,” which is neither distinctive nor particularly cute, so I just went with “puppy” instead. Anyway, here are two baby elephants holding trunks:

I know what you’re thinking: it reminds you of this, right?

Share

Going to Purgatory for Your Dog: A Comic

“The Dog’s Sins,” a comic by KC Green, looks at what might happen if a person stood in judgment for the wrongs committed in life by their dog.

dogs-sins-firstframe

(Cross-posted to Imgur, h/t BuzzFeed)

Share