Kansas Abortion Opponents Try Out a “Look What You Made Me Do” Strategy

By Anthony Appleyard (talk).Anthony Appleyard at en.wikipedia [Public domain], from Wikimedia CommonsWichita, Kansas had been abortion-clinic-free for several years, ever since someone shot and killed George Tiller in church. Now, however, a new clinic, the South Wind Women’s Center, has opened in the same spot, and it has anti-choice forces all up in a tizzy. They are taking a novel approach this time, however. They are asking the city to change the area’s zoning to “non business” so that South Wind cannot operate there, because they say the clinic will cause noise disruptions.

According to the Wichita Eagle, abortion opponents are citing several reasons that the clinic shouldn’t be allowed to operate in the community: several gun incidents that occurred when Tiller practiced there, the lack of communication between the clinic’s security staff and the anti-abortion activists to “defuse violence” before it occurs, the level of “antagonism” between the the clinic’s escorts and the anti-choice protesters, and the fact that it may be “inappropriate” for school children to see graphic signs and protests affiliated with the clinic.

So basically, the very same people who would be causing the noise are complaining about the possibility of noise. Don’t get me started on the “defuse violence” argument. This strikes me as a classic diversion tactic used by abusers: “Look what you made me do.” They regard loud, disruptive protests—complete with “graphic signs”—as some sort of natural result of a clinic opening in their town. Some (not all) even seem to regard violence as a likely outcome, with little to no thought of the moral agency of the people committing the violence:

Now, I know what some of you are thinking: What about showing some personal responsibility, anti-choicers? What about accepting that a clinic’s mere existence is not actually provoking you to do anything, whether it’s shoot someone or merely yell invective at them as they go about their business? But personal responsibility is so 2012 (unless you are black). We’re in a new era now, where the mere existence of free birth control means you have to take it and abortion providers are making you harass them just by existing. Willpower is dead.

Photo credit: By Anthony Appleyard (talk).Anthony Appleyard at en.wikipedia [Public domain], from Wikimedia Commons.

Share

I guess dogs won’t be getting married, then

"Anti Doggystyle Protester" via imgbit.com

“Anti Doggystyle Protester” via imgbit.com

A Mexican politician made an odd comment re: same-sex marriage, in which she seems to consider coital eye contact to be a prerequisite for nuptials (h/t Bob the Wonder Poodle):

Ana Maria Jimenez Ortiz, a local deputy of the PAN Party in Puebla, said during a forum on whether to legalize gay marriage in the state of Puebla that “marriage should only be considered as those relationships in which the members have sex while facing each other.”

The fun continued:

She said that this was based on the scientific method, asserting that only eye contract at time of copulation creates a true union.

“Who pretends to love decently using the favorite position of dogs!” she said.

The Facebook page that posted this link had an astute observation:

By this logic, heterosexual men can avoid commitment in relationships as long as they maintain a doggy-style only policy.

I’d just point out that Jimenez Ortiz is not being very creative.

Share

House Cats, Obligate Carnivores

Australian vegans allegedly nearly killed a kitten by feeding it a vegan diet, as shown in a picture of a newspaper clipping that has been going around on Facebook. Cats are essentially obligate carnivores, meaning that they have to have meat in their diets. Dogs can live, at least in theory, on a meat-free diet, but it’s still pretty damn cruel to the dog. If you are one to eschew all meat products in your home, you might seriously consider sticking to rabbits or llamas as pets, or just not having pets at all.

Anyway, I made a GIF set to express my thoughts on the matter:

Share

Monday Morning Cute: Newly-Discovered Cuteness

Scientists have discovered a “new” species of carnivore, the olinguito, in South America. I say “new” in quotes because the animal is not new, just the discovery. The olinguito has probably been scampering around the jungle for eons, not caring that humans had not assigned it a genus and species (Bassaricyon neblina, in case you’re curious).

To be fair, the olinguito is pretty adorable.

By Mark Gurney [CC-BY-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

 The olinguito gets its name from the classically-beautiful actress Lena Olin:

Bobby Mcdobbin [CC BY-SA 2.0], on Flickr

Wait, that’s not right. It gets its name from the olingo, a close-relative that also lives in South America, and is presumably slightly bigger than the olinguito. I don’t know if the olingo gets its name from the Olin family, but I sort of doubt it.

Lest you get carried away with the olinguito’s cuteness, keep in mind that it is a member of the family Procyonidae, part of the order Carnivora. So while it is in the same taxonomic orders as puppies and kittens, its closest well-known relative is the raccoon.

Photo credits: Mark Gurney [CC-BY-3.0], via Wikimedia Commons; Bobby Mcdobbin [CC BY-SA 2.0], on Flickr.

Share

Signal Boost: A Teen’s Brave Response to “I’m Christian, Unless You’re Gay”

Dan Pearce, who blogs at Single Dad Laughing, wrote an amazing post nearly two years ago entitled “I’m Christian, unless you’re gay.” The post talks about Pearce’s 27 year-old friend Jacob, who is gay, and who had lost any connection to almost all of his friends and family as a result.

“Every single person I’ve told has ditched me. They just disappear. They stop calling. They remove me on Facebook. They’re just gone,” he said. “They can’t handle knowing and being friends with a gay person.”

I didn’t know what to say. So I didn’t say anything.

“You don’t know what it’s like, man. You don’t know what it’s like to live here and be gay. You don’t know what it’s like to have freaking nobody. You don’t know what it’s like to have your own parents hate you and try and cover up your existence. I didn’t choose this. I didn’t want this. And I’m so tired of people hating me for it. I can’t take it anymore. I just can’t.”

How do you respond to that?

I wanted to tell him it was all in his head. I knew it wasn’t. I wanted to tell him it would get better and easier. The words would have been hollow and without conviction, and I knew it.

You see, I live in this community too. And I’ve heard the hate. I’ve heard the disgust. I’ve heard the disdain. I’ve heard the gossip. I’ve heard the distrust. I’ve heard the anger. I’ve heard it all, and I’ve heard it tucked and disguised neatly beneath a wrapper of self-righteousness and a blanket of “caring” or “religious” words. I’ve heard it more times than I care to number.

That was in November 2011. Several months later, in April 2012, he posted a follow-up, entitled “A Teen’s Brave Response to ‘I’m Christian, Unless You’re Gay,'” in which a mother described how her teenage son came out to her via Pearce’s original post: Continue reading

Share

If It Weren’t for You Meddling Kids!!!

Several of our Founding Fathers were barely out of their teens when the Declaration of Independence was signed, according to the Journal of the American Revolution. Some of them were still teenagers, actually:

Marquis de Lafayette, 18
James Monroe, 18
Gilbert Stuart, 20
Aaron Burr, 20
Alexander Hamilton, 21
Betsy Ross, 24
James Madison, 25

This sort of puts General Cornwallis‘ surrender at Yorktown in 1781 into a new perspective, doesn’t it? (Cornwallis was 42 years old at the time.)

"And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids!" (Via tvtropes.org)

“And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren’t for you meddling kids!” (Via tvtropes.org)

Share

A Settlement Proposal for BP

By NASA [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

On the plus side, scenes like this would probably totally scare off alien invaders.

BP has filed suit against the federal government over the EPA’s decision to suspend it from new federal contracts, after the company pleaded guilty to manslaughter and obstruction of justice (h/t Jennifer). The company now alleges that the EPA’s continued ban is “an abuse of discretion.”

The Deepwater Horizon incident was a clusterfuck of historic proportions, but those guilty pleas only resulted in a fine, plus probation and something called “independent monitoring.” Of course, the fine was for $4 billion, which seems like a large chunk of change to me and (I assume) you, but what is that to BP? As a result of the fallout from Deepwater Horizon, BP’s 2012 profits were “halved,” according to the Telegraph, to $12 billion.

In other words, the criminal penalty paid by BP for the deaths of eleven people, an 87-day ocean-floor oil gusher, and who-knows-how-much resulting damage, was one-third of their profit from 2012. Not their revenue, their profit. And if the Telegraph is right, it is only one-sixth of the profit they were expecting. If an individual pleaded guilty to killing eleven people and poisoning a large portion of ocean, that person would likely be spending some time in a very small room. That person certainly would not get any traction with a lawsuit against the government for refusing to hire them. Since corporations are supposed to be people, what gives?

I have an idea for a settlement that the EPA might propose, one that is undoubtedly fair based on BP’s own assurances: The EPA will lift the ban on BP contracts if all BP senior executives and directors personally perform community service by assisting with cleanup along the Gulf coast, specifically including time spent in the water with the “cleanup” chemicals the company used, that it assured everyone was safe. BP said that Corexit was no more dangerous than dish soap, so it shouldn’t be a big deal for the BP higher-ups to get at least elbow-deep in the stuff, right?

Of course, I know the EPA would never make that sort of offer, and I definitely know BP would never go for it. I’d just love to hear how BP tried to weasel out of it.

Photo credit: By NASA [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.

Share

Animal “Welfare,” Animal “Rights,” and Animal “Liberation”

"Butter Cow" by anneh632 [CC BY-SA 2.0], on Flickr

I was not familiar with butter cows until just now. Impressive work. (Via Flickr.)

Iowans for Animal Liberation made the news for allegedly dumping red paint on the official butter cow of the Iowa State Fair. (To be clear, this is a sculpture of a cow made entirely of butter, not a cow used to produce butter.)

The main reason I find this noteworthy is that the Associated Press described the group as an “animal welfare group,” not, say, the sort of group that uses the word “liberation” in its name and thinks dumping paint on a butter sculpture is an effect form of activism.

The individuals involved also wrote “Freedom for All” on the glass display case, according to the Des Moines Register. The Register described them as an “animal rights group,” which seems more apt than “animal welfare.”

Maybe I’m quibbling, but animal welfare is a cause near and dear to my heart, and dumping paint on a giant dairy sculpture doesn’t seem to advance that cause even the tiniest bit. Just my $0.02.

Photo credit: “Butter Cow” by anneh632 [CC BY-SA 2.0], on Flickr (NOTE: The butter cow pictured above is from the Illinois State Fair, for the record.)

Share

This Week in WTF, August 16, 2013

By Larali21 (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Via Wikimedia Commons

– A group of Catholics have taken to gathering around a tree in Fresno, California because, according to them, the tree weeps God’s tears. An arborist who examined the tree reached a different conclusion, however, attributing the liquid seeping from the tree to something much more earthly:

The aphides [tree lice] will suck the sap, the sap goes through the aphid and then it is a honey dew excrement from the aphid and it gets so heavy in the summertime that it will drip down.

These tree lice are excreting God’s tears, or something.

– Imagine a cup, or a straw, that could detect the presence of date-rape drugs. A company in Boston, DrinkSavvy, Inc., is apparently working on it. Says the project’s founder:

DrinkSavvy’s ultimate goal is to use the success of this campaign to convince bars, clubs and colleges to make DrinkSavvy the new safety standard and eventually make drug-facilitated sexual assault a crime of the past.

I am both impressed at the idea and the technology, and depressed at the necessity of the idea. ThinkProgress bills it as a way “to combat sexual assault without victim blaming,” but it still seems to put the burden on the victim, e.g. “You got roofied? Why weren’t you using a DrinkSavvy straw?”

– An Austin man was arrested for allegedly firing a gun through his own front window—from the outside—because he thought he heard his wife having sex with someone inside. He claimed he heard his wife “groaning” and heard a man’s voice say that he had a gun, so he started shooting. His wife wasn’t actually at home. The bullet ended up in a neighbor’s bedroom, where two people had been sleeping peacefully. This is sort of what I mean when I talk about my right not to get shot by some other dude with Second Amendment rights.

Share

A Special Prosecutor Will Be Looking at Rick Perry and the Public Integrity Unit

Via empireonline.com

Via empireonline.com

A senior district judge from San Antonio announced that he will name a special prosecutor to investigate allegations of “abuse of official capacity” and other charges against Texas Governor Rick Perry.

Texans for Public Justice filed a complaint against Perry with the Travis County District Attorney and the Travis County Attorney in June. Perry had threatened to withhold funding for the Public Integrity Unit (PIU), which investigates allegations of official misconduct, unless Travis County DA Rosemary Lehmberg resigned in the wake of her DWI conviction. (Perry may have had other reasons to want the PIU shut down.) Perry eventually vetoed funding for the PIU.

That veto took away about $3.7 million from the PIU. The Travis County Commissioners’ Court voted in early August to use $1.8 million of Travis County (not Texas) taxpayers’ money, plus over $700,000 “from another fund,” to keep the PIU going. This gave Lehmberg the opportunity to “scold” Perry. Continue reading

Share