This Week in WTF, August 3, 2012

Russia_stamp_no._1030_-_2012_Summer_Olympics_bid– Conservative British Prime Minister David Cameron disses presumptive presidential candidate Mitt Romney:

“We are holding an Olympic Games in one of the busiest, most active, bustling cities anywhere in the world. Of course it’s easier if you hold an Olympic Games in the middle of nowhere.”

So does London Mayor Boris Johnson.

– Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA) likens the Obamacare contraception mandate to the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor and the September 11, 2001 terror attacks. No really, this happened.

– A former Chick-fil-A employee is suing the company because of reasons:

Former Chick-fil-A employee Brenda Honeycutt is suing the company for gender discrimination, alleging that owner and operator of Duluth, Georgia’s Chick-fil-As, Jeff Howard, fired her so that she could be a “stay home mother” despite her “satisfactory-to-above-satisfactory employment history with the company.

“During the Plaintiff’s employment, Defendant Howard routinely made comments to the Plaintiff suggesting that as a mother she should stay home with her children,” the lawsuit states.

– A church in Mississippi, one of the states composing our allegedly post-racial nation, refused to marry a couple because they are black:

A black couple in Crystal Springs, Mississippi says that a predominantly white Baptist church refused to let them get married because of their race.

Charles and Te’Andrea Wilson told WLBT that the day before they were to be married, the pastor of First Baptist Church of Crystal Springs informed them the ceremony would have to be moved due to the reaction of some white church members — even though the couple had attended the church regularly.

“The church congregation had decided no black could be married at that church, and that if [the pastor] went on to marry her, then they would vote him out the church,” Charles Wilson explained.

We have to respect the delicate feelings of “some white church members,” amirite? I can’t wait to hear if there’s a non-discriminatory explanation.

– A small airplane towing a banner with a marriage proposal crashed in Rhode Island, after the pilot had to ditch. The pilot was found uninjured, after his apparently genius 8 year-old son helped the Coast Guard locate him. No word on whether the intended recipient of the proposal said yes.

– A puppeteer on a Christian-themed children’s show in Florida is arrested for conspiracy to kidnap children and, uh, other stuff. It sounds like police have evidence of some pretty heinous stuff, but it is not clear exactly what he actually did regarding the kidnapping conspiracy charge, versus what he just talked about doing. Technically, “extensive Internet chats about eating children” are not illegal in and of themselves without taking a furher step……you know, I don’t really want to talk about this.

– Some Breitbartian named John Nolte thinks that a new Skittles ad promotes bestiality or something. In other words don’t chase your Chick-fil-A sandwich with Skittles. Or Oreos. I’ll have to get back to you on which candies and cookies have the Almighty’s stamp of approval.

Photo credit: ‘Russia stamp no. 1030 – 2012 Summer Olympics bid’ by Russian Post/Beltyukov V., painter [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.

Share

Batman is a River in Turkey

320px-Batman,_TurkeySeriously.

The Batman River is a major tributary of the Tigris, joining it near the source of Tigris called Dicle River in southeast Turkey. It originates in the Anti-Taurus Mountains (at the Sason and Genç mountains) and flows approximately from north to south, passing near the city of Batman and forming a natural border between the Batman Province and Diyarbakır Province.

It’s also a city and a province.

Just thought you should know. I seriously doubt that the town has anything related to Bruce Wayne, so if you’re going to attempt “Batman tourism,” please don’t be a douche about it.

Photo credit: ‘Batman, Turkey’ by Bryce Edwards [CC-BY-2.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

Share

This is why you shouldn’t smoke, kids

You shouldn’t smoke, because it’s a bad habit and you set a bad example. In particular, you set a bad example for orangutans.

Via Tecca:

The Satwa Taru Jurug zoo in Indonesia announced that it is launching an intervention for Tori, a 15-year-old orangutan with a smoking problem. The great ape started the habit about 10 years ago by picking up old cigarette butts and imitating the people she saw. After that, zoo visitors began throwing lit cigarettes into her enclosure.

The zoo has decided that it would set additional volunteers to watch Tori’s home and putting up a mesh screen so she cannot reach any cigarettes. She and her mate will soon be moved to an island preserve where she will have even more distance from visitors and possible sources of nicotine. According to The Associated Press, the Center for Orangutan Protection is helping to launch the intervention to stop Tori’s smoking cold turkey and will test how the nicotine has impacted Tori’s health.

Smart ape, asshole visitors. It’s good that they’re getting moved somewhere safer, hopefully where people aren’t quite such…..I mean, who the hell throws lit cigarettes to an ape at the zoo???

Anyway, here’s a video of a monkey playing Angry Birds, sort of.

Share

Our ungrateful rich

'Singapore Merlion BCT' by Bjørn Christian Tørrissen [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia CommonsAmerica has quite a few brilliant but lucky entrepreneurs who work within the American system to make a lot of money, then whine about having to pay to help sustain that system.

Eduardo Saverin came to the U.S. from Brazil because his parents didn’t want him to be kidnapped:

Saverin, who stands to make billions from his 4 percent share in Facebook, hastily moved here at the age of 13 when his name turned up on a list of potential kidnap victims targeted by criminal gangs in Brazil. His father was a wealthy businessman, with a high profile in their home country, and so his family relocated to Miami to protect the youngster. Eduardo thrived in his new country, eventually attending Harvard University, where he had a stroke of life-changing luck when he was assigned future Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg as a roommate.

After years of reaping the benefits of a society that does reasonably well at preventing kidnapping, he became a billionaire. Then he moved to Singapore. Then, standing to make billions on Facebook’s IPO, he renounced his U.S. citizenship. Continue reading

Share

SXSWi Diary, Day One

SXSWi registration lineSome thoughts on my first day of SXSW Interactive (or SXSWi, as the cool kids say).

This is an overwhelming clusterfuck of humanity. I’ve never ridden on an escalator so jammed with people that a second’s hesitation by one person in getting off at the bottom could almost cause a rather catastrophic dogpile. Fortunately, you might have noticed I said “almost.” I doubt whoever it was even realized the extent of the chaos they almost caused.

I should probably note at this point, in case you’re looking at the photos (not stock photos, I might add) that if you plan on uploading pictures from your mobile phone to Flickr and have them come out looking right, you need to hold your phone sideways when taking the picture. There’s nothing you can do to fix that once it’s online, short of downloading it, rotating it in a program like Paint Shop, and uploading it again. Here endeth the lesson.

SXSWi registration lineRegistration was, I thought at the time, a long and difficult process of waiting in line. In all, I must have spent half an hour in that line! I would later realize that arriving at the Convention Center at 8:30 a.m. was wise (thank you, girlfriend with an actual day job, for the ride!) for the line stretched all the way around the Convention Center by mid-day, and it seemed to only grow longer. I suspect people were getting their badges for all the festivals (film, music, etc.) and not just Interactive. Should you ever find yourself in attendance here, I highly recommend not sleeping late the first day.

Having obtained my badge by 9:30 a.m., I noticed that panels did not start until 2:00 p.m. Actualy, I already knew that, but it sounds more dramatic this way. I spent a bit of time trying to do actual work, to no avail, wandered a bit, soaked in the all-encompassing hugeness of the event, and then mooched free food off the aforementioned girlfriend.

By around 1:00, it was time to make a decision. I opted to brave the elements and make my way from the Convention Center to the Driskill Hotel, a hike of only a few blocks, but one involving a steady spray of nature’s ball sweat from the sky. The presentation at the Driskill was the intriguingly-titled “Sex on the Web: The Sabotage of Relationships?” (#SXWebSex on Twitter). It was originally going to be a solo presentation by someone who was probably going to take a staunchly anti-porn position. The substitute presenters, Julie Gillis, Mia Martina, Rosie Q, and Sadie Smythe, all of whom are producers of the local stage show “Bedpost Confessions,” assured us they were not anti-porn.

I actually took notes at this panel, something I do not do often. The overall theme was the effect that the easy availability of sex-type stuff on the internet has on relationships. It goes beyond just surreptitious porn watching. The internet is full of erotic blogs, chat rooms, and so on. They brought up quite a few points that merit far greater discussion in society. This is paraphrased from my notes. If I know for a fact I am quoting someone directly, I used quotes. Everything else is ased off my recollection of what was said:

  • The internet has allowed people to discover kinks they didn’t know they had.
  • It also allows isolated people to find others like them (e.g. gay teenagers)
  • The decrease in marriage rates over the past few decades, along with the rise in cohabitation, might compel people to start talking to each other about what they really want in their relationship (lack of communication being one of the greatest problems in relationships).
  • As many as 3/4 of divorces cite Facebook in some way. Lack of communication beforehand is what really caused the divorce, most likely. The internet is a symptom of lack of connection in your real life.
  • The internet lets us discover new parts of ourselves, and we may find we want different things. Divorce doesn’t mean a marriage failed, just that people change.
  • “Our web history is the new porn stash.”
  • More straight people need to “come out” as allies to LGBTQ people, and as sex-positives.
  • Raise the stakes on talking about sex (treat it with respect) and lower the stakes at the same time.

Someone asked a question about Ashley Madison, the affair-based dating site. Rosie Q stressed that “none of us are pro-cheating; we’re pro-communication.” They noted that a site like that could be an example of how the web could be destructive to relationships. It gives people a save haven to get laid, but not to communicate in their marriages. Also, they asked rather rhetorically, what does it really mean to “save” a marriage?

Samsung Bloggers' LoungeI braved the elements to return to the Convention Center, and decided to check out the Samsung Bloggers’ Lounge. Lots of tables, but not much in the way of real “lounging.” Which was a shame, because I was tired, dammit. The major high point of that part of the day was the announcement, with a remarkable amount of fanfare, of the impending release of “Angry Birds: Space” from whomever makes “Angry Birds.” I had the choice between waiting in a line for a free Angry Birds t-shirt or sitting and finishing my blog post on Leslie Cochran. I’m sure the t-shirt I could have gotten will make someone else very happy.

Weapons of Mouse DestructionFor the last panel of the day, I went to “Iranian Outlaws: Satire vs. Censorship” (#SXOutlaws on Twitter). This was by an Iranian filmmaker who uses humor to fight the regime. His show is called “Parazit,” and it has been compared to “The Daily Show,” I hear. They use pictures sent in by Iranian kids and Photoshop them to make them funny. I missed a lot of the presentation, in part because I was late and in additional part because I was really freaking tired by then. He says that traffic dies out in Tehran on Fridays when their show is on. They became so popular that the Iranian government sent commandos to rooftops via helicopter to smash satellite dishes (he showed us pictures). They’ve developed a bigger project that looks pretty phenomenal, called Weapons of Mouse Destruction. There was apparently also a t-shirt involved in this presentation.

At this point, it was 6:00 p.m., and I had been downtown for almost 10 hours. But it was only two hours until TechKaraoke! I have been singularly unexcited about most nighttime SXSW activities, except this one. I just needed to kill some time.

I attempted to go to some tech-lawyer-themed party that ran from 5 to 7. After walking 6 blocks in frogod drizzle, I arrived at the bar at 6:30 to learn that, rather than ending in 30 minutes, the event ended 30 minutes earlier. I did not receive that memo.

And that is how I came to be standing in a doorway on 6th Street to shelter myself from the rain while eating a bratwurst.

Some random chick singing Whitesnake at TechKaraokeBut my tale does not end there. Finding myself momentarily without shelter or much of anything to do, I opted to show up to the bar hosting TechKaraoke early. They were busy. So I continued down the street. The good people of El Sol y la Luna were kind enough to take me in, let me sit at the bar, type most of this blog post, and sell me food at full price. I salute your Tex-Mex awesomeness.

After that, I went to TechKaraoke. After listening to two songs, I realized I was very tired and my back hurt from carrying a backpack around all day, so I went home. See all you geeks and hipsters tomorrow.

Share

Cooler heads might have prevailed

In 1945, President Truman appointed Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson as the chief prosecutor for the planned tribunals to try accused Nazi war criminals:

The privilege of opening the first trial in history for crimes against the peace of the world imposes a grave responsibility. The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant, and so devastating, that civilization cannot tolerate their being ignored, because it cannot survive their being repeated. That four great nations, flushed with victory and stung with injury stay the hand of vengeance and voluntarily submit their captive enemies to the judgment of the law is one of the most significant tributes that Power has ever paid to Reason.

 

This Tribunal, while it is novel and experimental, is not the product of abstract speculations nor is it created to vindicate legalistic theories. This inquest represents the practical effort of four of the most mighty of nations, with the support of 17 more, to utilize international law to meet the greatest menace of our times-aggressive war. The common sense of mankind demands that law shall not stop with the punishment of petty crimes by little people. It must also reach men who possess themselves of great power and make deliberate and concerted use of it to set in motion evils which. leave no home in the world untouched. It is a cause of that magnitude that the United Nations will lay before Your Honors.

 

In the prisoners’ dock sit twenty-odd broken men. Reproached by the humiliation of those they have led almost as bitterly as by the desolation of those they have attacked, their personal capacity for evil is forever past. It is hard now to perceive in these men as captives the power by which as Nazi leaders they once dominated much of the world and terrified most of it. Merely as individuals their fate is of little consequence to the world.

 

What makes this inquest significant is that these prisoners represent sinister influences that will lurk in the world long after their bodies have returned to dust. We will show them to be living symbols of racial hatreds, of terrorism and violence, and of the arrogance and cruelty of power. They are symbols of fierce nationalisms and of militarism, of intrigue and war-making which have embroiled Europe generation after generation, crushing its manhood, destroying its homes, and impoverishing its life. They have so identified themselves with the philosophies they conceived and with the forces they directed that any tenderness to them is a victory and an encouragement to all the evils which are attached to their names. Civilization can afford no compromise with the social forces which would gain renewed strength if we deal ambiguously or indecisively with the men in whom those forces now precariously survive.

 

***

 

No charity can disguise the fact that the forces which these defendants represent, the forces that would advantage and delight in their acquittal, are the darkest and most sinister forces in society-dictatorship and oppression, malevolence and passion, militarism and lawlessness. By their fruits we best know them. Their acts have bathed the world in blood and set civilization back a century. They have subjected their European neighbors to every outrage and torture, every spoliation and deprivation that insolence, cruelty, and greed could inflict. They have brought the German people to the lowest pitch of wretchedness, from which they can entertain no hope of early deliverance. They have stirred hatreds and incited domestic violence on every continent. These are the things that stand in the dock shoulder to shoulder with these prisoners.

 

The real complaining party at your bar is Civilization. In all our countries it is still a struggling and imperfect thing. It does not plead that the United States, or any other country, has been blameless of the conditions which made the German people easy victims to the blandishments and intimidations of the Nazi conspirators.

 

But it points to the dreadful sequence of aggressions and crimes I have recited, it points to the weariness of flesh, the exhaustion of resources, and the destruction of all that was beautiful or useful in so much of the world, and to greater potentialities for destruction in the days to come. It is not necessary among the ruins of this ancient and beautiful city with untold members of its civilian inhabitants still buried in its rubble, to argue the proposition that to start or wage an aggressive war has the moral qualities of the worst of crimes. The refuge of the defendants can be only their hope that international law will lag so far behind the moral sense of mankind that conduct which is crime in the moral sense must be regarded as innocent in law.

 

Civilization asks whether law is so laggard as to be utterly helpless to deal with crimes of this magnitude by criminals of this order of importance. It does not expect that you can make war impossible. It does expect that your juridical action will put the forces of international law, its precepts, its prohibitions and, most of all, its sanctions, on the side of peace, so that men and women of good will, in all countries, may have “leave to live by no man’s leave, underneath the law.”

 

Robert H. Jackson, Chief of Counsel for the United States, Nuremberg, Germany, November 21, 1945

To compare al-Qaeda directly to the Nazis is of course to give al-Qaeda far too much credit, but there is an obvious analogy to be made. Of all the reasons that the torture and other depredations of the Bush years should be investigated and prosecuted, perhaps one of the greatest and least-mentioned is this: in addition to losing our moral standing in the world, consider what the world has lost in terms of opportunities to bring organizations like al-Qaeda to light, to expose them for the cowards and liars that they are, and to begin the process of redressing the conditions so as to make such acts as the 9/11 attacks inconceivable to all humanity. I am not naive enough to think that war and terror can be stamped out solely through honesty, but the fundamental laws of human dignity and decency did not cease to function in September 2001. It is precisely the calm and measured tone of Justice Jackson that has been sorely missing for the past 7+ years. What if the knowledge gleaned from Khalid Sheikh Mohammed‘s (pre-torture) interrogation had been made known to the world in 2003 or 2004? What more could have been accomplished in stemming the tide of hatred and violence fomented by the bin Ladens of the world if we had kept our sights on them the whole time? We will never know, and that is a loss that should not go unredressed.

Share

Question re: pirate standoff

OK, I understand the importance of safeguarding the captain held hostage aboard the pirates’ lifeboat, as well as the 200-odd other hostages held by Somali pirates elsewhere. This isn’t something where we (and by that I mean the U.S. military) should charge in guns blazing–those times are quite rare, if they exist at all. Keeping the hostages safe is the most important factor, although I think “never negotiating with terrorists” is strongly vying for the top spot among priorities. And yes, just because your motives are pecuniary and not ideological doesn’t mean you are not a terrorist–just my $0.02.

Here’s what I don’t get, though: the U.S.S. Bainbridge, an Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer, is “keeping its distance, in part to stay out of the pirates’ range of fire.”

I am no expert in naval strategy and tactics, nor do I have any proficiency in hostage negotiations (particularly where there are potentially multiple hostages in play in multiple locations). But really, unless they are carrying suitcase nukes, what could the pirates possibly have on board the lifeboat that could seriously threaten the Bainbridge? The only shots fired so far appear to have been fired by the pirates during an escape attempt by the hostage. Does the Bainbridge have any Marine snipers on board or anything? Maybe I’ve just seen too many movies, but when the most powerful Navy the world has ever known is held at bay by a lifeboat, something just seems a bit wrong.

Discuss.

Share

It’s good to be the king

I can’t say I agree with or approve of the practice going on here, but I am astonished to see this headline in 2008:

Bare-breasted virgins compete for Swaziland king

By Phakamisa Ndzamela

LUDZIDZINI ROYAL VILLAGE, Swaziland (Reuters) – Tens of thousands of bare-breasted virgins competed for Swaziland King Mswati III’s eye on Monday in a traditional Reed Dance.

Walking through the dense crowds in a leopard skin loin cloth, Sub-Saharan Africa’s last absolute monarch was expected to choose his 14th wife.

Critics say Mswati, who has courted controversy for his lavish lifestyle while two thirds of his subjects live in poverty, sets a bad example by encouraging polygamy and teenage sex in a country where about 40 percent of adults live with HIV.

Some of the women did not seem to mind, hoping to escape from the southern African nation’s hardships for the easy life.

“I came here to dance. I wish the king would have chosen me because it’s nice at the king’s place. The wives live a nice life,” said Tenene Dlamini, 16, in a traditional brown skirt.

“Everything is done for them. They don’t work. They earn.”

Wow. Just wow. Read more about this guy here.

Share

Happy Tunguska Day!!!

Speaking of destroying the world, today is the 100th anniversary of the meteor/comet/Cylon basestar impact over Tunguska, Siberia.

Bad Astronomy has all the gory details:

100 years ago today, a small chunk of rock or possibly ice was lazily making its way across the inner solar system when a large, blue-green planet got in its way. Traveling roughly westward, it entered the Earth’s atmosphere moving at tens of thousands kilometers per hour. Compressed and battered by tremendous forces, the object got about 5 – 10 kilometers from the ground before it succumbed, exploding like a gigantic multi-megaton bomb.

The air blast flattened trees for hundreds of square kilometers. The ground shook, witnesses felt the hellish heat from kilometers away, and the shock wave circled the world. It happened over the remote Podkammenaya Tungus river, a swampy region in Russia; had it happened over Moscow a million people might have died within minutes.

Now known as the Tunguska Event, it stands today as a shocking reminder that we live in a cosmic shooting gallery, and the Earth sits in the crosshairs of many objects.

I’m not too worried about impacts from outer space objects. Hopefully we’d see it coming, and if there’s anything we could do about it, we would (one hopes). My concern is what would happen if something like Tunguska happened today and it wasn’t terribly destructive, because it would probably be followed shortly by someone’s nuclear arsenal, and then there would be terrible destruction. Overreaction, I’m sayin’. Imagine, if you will, that today was the 50th anniversary of Tunguska, not the 100th. That would mean that, on June 30, 1958, a massive fireball of uncertain origin erupted over Siberia. We know now that the Soviets didn’t have as much atomic annihilation capacity as was once feared (although it was and is pretty f–in’ scary), but they also had a highly flawed decision-making structure. It would at least make for some interesting alternate history.

Share