Beauty and Bad Journalism (UPDATED)

'Florence Colgate' [Fair use], via Facebook and GawkerMeet Florence Colgate. She is an 18 year-old resident of Deal, Kent, England, the equivalent of a high school senior. She might be the most beautiful woman in the world, according to both “science” and Gawker editor Neetzan Zimmerman.

Zimmerman made this declaration because, apparently, Zimmerman does not know how to read. “Science” may have been misquoted, as it was probably too busy with things like the Large Hadron Collider to worry about who is the fairest of them all.

Now, Colgate is a phenomenally attractive young woman. Almost into the realm of otherworldliness, if photographs are to be believed. I’m also sure she is a very nice person. She’s getting hate on her Facebook page that she doesn’t deserve. But really, the whole world? Doesn’t picking a blond, blue-eyed, English girl as the most beautiful woman on all of planet Earth seem a bit convenient?

I’ll set aside the questions of the various racial and gender implications of this selection, because others can undoubtedly address those issues with greater knowledge than I ever could. I would instead like to address the undue violence that this story has done to the concepts of journalism and science. Continue reading

Share

A hot high school teacher is accused of sleeping with a student. Commence pearl clutching in 3, 2, 1…

Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader Sarah Jones after an NFL game on Sept. 3, 2009, in Cincinnati. Credit: AP Photo/David Kohl [Fair use]

Including a picture will help with page views.

When a teacher is accused of inappropriate relations with a student, we as a society have a tendency to react differently depending on who occupies which position on the victim/perpetrator scale. Let me be abundantly clear here that sexual relationships between high school teachers and their students are bad. Unequivocally, uniformly bad, mmmkay? We tend to uniformly condemn male perpetrators who allegedly prey on anyone, long before the trial even starts. When the alleged perpetrator is a woman, though, we are sometimes less certain how to respond.

When the alleged perpetrator is an attractive woman, our notions of gender roles get all befuddled.

When the alleged perpetrator is a former NFL head cheerleader, we go into full-on slut-shaming mode.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

More than anything else, I want to smack that reporter in the face until he admits that he does not work for TMZ.

I don’t know what went on between Sarah Jones and her alleged, unnamed victim (justifiably unnamed because he’s a minor). Prosecutors in Kenton County, Kentucky say they have e-mails and other correspondence that proves the existence of a sexual relationship sometime between October and December 2011. Jones denies any inappropriate relationship. So does the alleged victim, or so we hear. Interestingly, joining the chorus of support for Jones is the alleged victim’s family. Whatever is going on in this case, it is getting interesting.

The twist in this case, at least culturally-speaking, is this:

(1) Sarah Jones is kind of a slamming hottie, particularly when she is all done up in her cheerleader garb. Your typical high school boy, again, culturally speaking, would have rather clear feelings about that. That would not justify a relationship in any way at all, because even a horny kid is still just a kid. The complication for the boy is that a great many people might be tempted not to view him as that much of a victim. This puts the kid in the untenable position of being a victim who is expected, in some circles, to be proud of his victimization. At times, this makes cases like these very difficult to prosecute. At other times, it could make prosecutors very eager to go after such a case, based on an assumption that the victim will not want to talk about it. Or will want to talk about it. If we could just deal with the case based on its particular facts, wouldn’t it be a great world?

(2) Sarah Jones is kind of a slamming hottie, particularly when she is all done up in her cheerleader garb. Some circles of our society (see the TODAY video above) may view her hotness and her choice of skimpy garb as evidence of her guilt, whether they realize it or not. The fact that Sarah Jones once earned supplemental income as a cheerleader has exactly zero to do with the question of her guilt or innocence. But damn if we don’t view that as somehow suspect. Here’s what would tend to go towards proving her guilt: (a) a confession; (b) direct evidence of sexual contact between her and the alleged victim, in the form of DNA, photographs, overt written or recorded references, or eyewitness testimony (which usually comes from one of the two parties to the relationship); or (c) indirect evidence, in the form of cell phone records, sightings of the two in public, the defendant’s car at the alleged victim’s house at 3:00 a.m., and so forth. Here’s what would not tend to go towards proving her guilt: (a) being a cheerleader; (b) wearing short skirts and skimpy tops; (c) getting paid to wear short skirts and skimpy tops; (d) being a young, hot high school teacher who also works as a cheerleader.

If she did it, she should go to jail. If she didn’t, everyone shut up about the cheerleader outfit. Actually, either way, everyone shut up about the cheerleader outfit.

'Lafave' by FL DOC [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Possibly the best mug shot in the history of law enforcement (a fact that was irrelevant to the question of her guilt.)

It might be tempting to think that women get some sort of….not free…but easier pass in cases like this. Debra LaFave only got house arrest and probation, for example, for her tryst with a 14 year-old. This is not the whole story. Remember that for every convicted female perpetrator that gets a seemingly light sentence, there is a male victim that isn’t really viewed as a victim. This is because of two cultural stereotypes: (a) dudes want to do the nasty, and (b) girls are delicate flowers who can’t really hurt us. That may turn out a lighter prison sentence for one female perpetrator, but the rest of humanity–male, female, trans*, and so forth–is worse off for it. It involves negative stereotypes on both sides, but the one against women (that they can’t really hurt men) easily feeds into the stereotype that they can’t really do many things. Then the dudes step in to do things for them.

What I am really saying in that last paragraph is, if you try to use this as an example of how men are the real victims in society, I will mock you. Mercilessly. Possibly using gay porn. Because I know you’d hate that. (Or would you???)

Photo credits: ‘Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader Sarah Jones after an NFL game on Sept. 3, 2009, in Cincinnati,’ AP Photo/David Kohl [Fair use], via CBS News; ‘Lafave’ by FL DOC [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Share

Porn and Prejudice: Newspaper Edition

Silhouette of Stripper on a PoleHouston was shocked, shocked! to learn that one of the Houston Chronicle’s society reporters — truly the last guardians of dignity in our culture — was moonlighting as a (gasp) stripper. Now she no longer works as a society reporter, and presumably society is safe once more.

Richard Connelly, a writer for the Houston Post, broke the story with all the gravitas you might expect from the guy who broke the story of hot chicks on the Texas sex offender registry. When faced with criticism that all he was doing was good old-fashioned slut-shaming, he tried to deny it by confirming it:

I don’t get the”slut shaming” charge. If you want to be a stripper, fine.

If you want to write for a very conservative, uptight paper — covering the very powerful, very conservative and straitlaced people the paper so desperately works to keep happy and unruffled — fine.

If you want to combine the two, it’s interesting, to say the least.

Andrea Grimes aptly addresses why Connelly probably really doesn’t think it’s “fine:”

Connelly’s entire post belies the “If you want to be a stripper, fine,” sentence. Obviously it’s not “fine” with Connelly or he wouldn’t have written an entire blog post on this woman, dug up background information on her, posted pictures so everyone could see what she looks like, contacted her bosses to make sure they knew she was a stripper and–here’s the journalism 101 FAIL, guys: posted the whole thing before he had heard from her for comment (or heard from her declining to do so).

This strikes me as an example of a person creating a situation, then claiming that it is something important, “interesting,” and newsworthy. Connelly acts like he is motivated out of concern that a reporter at a conservative Texas newspaper is also a low-level sex worker, but the whole thing might have never come to light had he not broken the story himself. It is the journalistic equivalent of internet hunting. Besides, Tressler wasn’t exactly hiding.

It’s not terribly hard to drum up a bit of outrage by revealing that someone works on the side as a — gasp! — stripper. Houston has a rather tremendous number of strip clubs (I have heard that it has among the biggest number of strip clubs per capita in the country, whatever that means, but I can’t find figures on that, alas.) It should not be surprising to learn that a Houstonian works or has worked as a stripper, any more than learning that a Houstonian has patronized a strip club. Many people seem to still think that activities in strip clubs are much more interesting (and less legal) than they usually are. The bottom line is that it is an effective way for some people to make money, and now one person has lost the job most directly related to their career. Working as a stripper is only scandalous because certain busybodies make it so.

In closing, the best headline to come out of this manufactroversy: “Stripper Holds Shameful Secret Day Job as a Reporter.”

Photo credit: Silhouette of Stripper on a Pole by Momoko (Open Clip Art library image’s page) [see page for license], via Wikimedia Commons.

Share

Happy National Cleavage Day!

Yes, this really is a thing.

I was going to quote from the article, but it’s such a painful mishmash of British boob puns, I couldn’t do it. Lest you think this is a serious holiday, it’s just a way to sell bras by showcasing cleavage. I must be getting older, because I’m just not that inspired.

WordPress won’t let me embed their somewhat-obnoxious video. Just know that it features women in brand-name brassieres and lingering shots of dudes with varying degrees of surprise or embarrassment on display.

Here’s a GIF of Allison Brie from “Community.” You’re welcome.

 

Share

Hell hath no fury

Presented not for myself, but on behalf of people I care about.

Hell Hath No Fury, graphic by sarahlee310

November 6, 2012: Get your ass out there and vote.

Photo credit: Hell Hath No Fury by sarahlee310

Share

Admit it, this does not contribute to the game itself in any way

Sports viewers, by and large, tend to be male. Statistical support or no, that is the conventional wisdom.

Male television viewers, by and large, tend to like certain things. These things are also part of conventional wisdom, statistical support or no: violence, beer, boobs. (This is not an exhaustive list, by the way.)

So how do marketers get more people (i.e. guys) to watch the Olympics?

Violence: there’s only so much you can do to make Olympic sports more violent, and the potential cost in international relations probably outweighs any benefit to ratings.

Beer: even the most hardcore boozehound would probably agree that the middle of a mountain biking run or a swim meet is not the best time to down a few.

Boobs: Hmmmmm…tell me more……

(h/t to Ragen) Let’s face it, there is no athletic advantage to wearing skimpy outfits, unless the knowledge that lots of people are staring at your bum improves your game. As Aussie blogger Lauredhel said in preparation for the 2008 Olympics:

No. It’s not about faster, higher, stronger. Women in sports are promoted as sexualised bodies for ogling; men are promoted as performers.

She offered a side-by-side comparison of male and female athletic outfits for the Australian teams, such as:

Here are a few side-by-side comparisons of what Aussie contenders are put into

In case you can’t see the image, on the left is a male beach volleyball player in a comfortably-baggy jersey and shorts that reach at least halfway down his thighs. On the right are two female players with remarkable abs. We know this because we can see all of them, and can offer a clinic description of the muscle tone in their thighs.

Not quite a year ago, the Badminton World Federation, trying to combat the problem of no one ever watching badminton, tried to mandate that female players wear skirts. They quickly ditched that rule in the face of massive criticism. They need to either find a different way to drum up interest in the sport, or just admit that few people enjoy watching a sport with a game piece called a shuttlecock.

Now, it would not add anything to my experience of watching the Olympics to put male athletes into similarly-revealing uniforms, nor would it add anything to the actual performance of the Games themselves.

But neither would it take away from my experience of watching the Olympics (or their performance) to put female athletes into uniforms that make a bit more athletic sense. Plus, it’s not about me. There is some evidence that all this sexifying is turning girls away from getting involved in sports at all, and that’s bad in and of itself.

If I want to see beautiful ripped women in skimpy clothes in various states of sweatiness, Rule 34 dictates that it is available to me at any time on the internet. If I want to see world-class displays of athletic prowess, that only happens a few times a decade.

Consider this an example of my point and/or eye candy. Here’s Croatian high jumper Blanka Vlašić in Greece in 2009. She probably could have performed just as well with a bit more clothes on and still done a sexy dance:

All of this said, I am sure I will still watch beach volleyball this summer.

Share

SXSW Diary, Day Five

Travis County Courthouse

Nothing remotely related to SXSW was going on in the building today

I began the last day of the Interactive festival in just the way that anyone trying to leave their law career behind would like to begin it. By going to court.

I also had a rather inauspicious beginning to the day due to an unfortunate goof. Since I spent the weekend at a sleepover of sorts, I had not had an opportunity to “spring forward” with any of the clocks at home. When I got home last night, tired from a day of learning and growing as a person, the time change of the previous day was the farthest thing from my mind.

When my alarm clock went off at 7:00 a.m., affording me a whole two hours to wake up, shower, remember how to tie a tie, and get my butt to the courthouse, I did not realize it was actually 8:00 a.m. For once, I’m glad I have this compulsive need to wake up earlier than is strictly necessary. Rather than make it to the courthouse with around 30 minutes to spare. I arrived with around 3 extra minutes. The simple fact that I arrived on time should be cause for a damn parade, but I still don’t see any bunting.

Miraculously, I was in an out of court in record time, arriving at just short of 9:15 a.m. and adjourning just after 9:30. With the catastrophic traffic, I was parking near the Convention Center by about 10:15, and comically changing clothes in the car. Luckily, no one walked by to see the show.

Since I had just been reminded that I am a lawyer…

I got in just in time for a CLE presentation, which I decided I should attend because hey! CLE credit!

I went to two CLE sessions, which I will delve into on my law blog:

The Sweetness plays the Samsung Bloggers' LoungeBack to the Lounge!!!

I could tell I was burning out on panels, almost for good, as I fled the CLE room ahead of a panel on something like “Maximizing Revenues from Film.” You would think I could want to hear that, but I felt like just talking to people.

Once again, the bloggers’ lounge proved to be a great place to get free food and meet people. I met a fellow legal ghost-blogger. An interesting band called the Sweetness played, and then they kicked us out at 4:00 p.m., a couple hours earlier than on previous days.

SXSW NSFW

To cap off the conference, I headed with a friend to a session at the Sheraton Hotel. Thus involved a rather comical search for a Car2Go and a ponderous drive through absurd amounts of traffic. Our destination? A session titled “This Talk Is NSFW: Nudity and Online Journalism.” Thanks to traffic, we missed the first half, and I’m not sure I ever quite picked up the thread of the discussion.

As we walked in, the speaker, Keith Plocek, the Director of Web Content and Traffic at Village Voice Media, was showing slides of people in various states of undress and asking people to vote on whether they thought the image was “NSFW.” The issue was when a newspaper or other news source should tag an article or picture as NSFW. The general rule relates to context, but it can also be quite political. Whether or not to tag a picture, he said, largely depends on who is being sexy in the picture. Pictures that seem “gay” are much more likely to get tagged. Using the NSFW tag is a great way to get traffic, but it will get you angry comments if it’s too tame. You don’t want to deceive your readers about this issue, silly as it may seem, because that erodes your overall credibility.

He also talked about the importance of “covering” events as opposed to “pandering.” “Pandering” would be putting a naked woman somewhere and taking pictures, as opposed to covering a porn convention already in progress. He showed photos of the World Naked Bike Ride in Los Angeles from a few years ago. He said the page got about 800,000 views when they posted it, and then it leveled off. The page got even more hits the following year, in anticipation of the next ride, and now it’s up to about 2.5 million hits. Obviously, the NSFW tag gets attention.

They have to make some editorial decisions about what to cover, though, so they don’t over-use the tag. For example, they cannot cover every burlesque event in the city.

One question from the audience was about violent content. The NSFW can be used for violent content as well as sexual content. Apparently there is another tag, NSFL (“not safe for life” or “not safe for lunch”), used for particularly disturbing violent content. People tend to have certain expectations when they click on a link tagged “NSFW,” i.e. boobs. Don’t show them something really gross if they are expecting boobs.

And that’s all she wrote…

I wanted to go to the party thrown by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, but by the time I got home, I knew that is where I’d be staying.

Tomorrow, I catch up on work.

Thursday, music…

Share

SXSWi Diary, Day One

SXSWi registration lineSome thoughts on my first day of SXSW Interactive (or SXSWi, as the cool kids say).

This is an overwhelming clusterfuck of humanity. I’ve never ridden on an escalator so jammed with people that a second’s hesitation by one person in getting off at the bottom could almost cause a rather catastrophic dogpile. Fortunately, you might have noticed I said “almost.” I doubt whoever it was even realized the extent of the chaos they almost caused.

I should probably note at this point, in case you’re looking at the photos (not stock photos, I might add) that if you plan on uploading pictures from your mobile phone to Flickr and have them come out looking right, you need to hold your phone sideways when taking the picture. There’s nothing you can do to fix that once it’s online, short of downloading it, rotating it in a program like Paint Shop, and uploading it again. Here endeth the lesson.

SXSWi registration lineRegistration was, I thought at the time, a long and difficult process of waiting in line. In all, I must have spent half an hour in that line! I would later realize that arriving at the Convention Center at 8:30 a.m. was wise (thank you, girlfriend with an actual day job, for the ride!) for the line stretched all the way around the Convention Center by mid-day, and it seemed to only grow longer. I suspect people were getting their badges for all the festivals (film, music, etc.) and not just Interactive. Should you ever find yourself in attendance here, I highly recommend not sleeping late the first day.

Having obtained my badge by 9:30 a.m., I noticed that panels did not start until 2:00 p.m. Actualy, I already knew that, but it sounds more dramatic this way. I spent a bit of time trying to do actual work, to no avail, wandered a bit, soaked in the all-encompassing hugeness of the event, and then mooched free food off the aforementioned girlfriend.

By around 1:00, it was time to make a decision. I opted to brave the elements and make my way from the Convention Center to the Driskill Hotel, a hike of only a few blocks, but one involving a steady spray of nature’s ball sweat from the sky. The presentation at the Driskill was the intriguingly-titled “Sex on the Web: The Sabotage of Relationships?” (#SXWebSex on Twitter). It was originally going to be a solo presentation by someone who was probably going to take a staunchly anti-porn position. The substitute presenters, Julie Gillis, Mia Martina, Rosie Q, and Sadie Smythe, all of whom are producers of the local stage show “Bedpost Confessions,” assured us they were not anti-porn.

I actually took notes at this panel, something I do not do often. The overall theme was the effect that the easy availability of sex-type stuff on the internet has on relationships. It goes beyond just surreptitious porn watching. The internet is full of erotic blogs, chat rooms, and so on. They brought up quite a few points that merit far greater discussion in society. This is paraphrased from my notes. If I know for a fact I am quoting someone directly, I used quotes. Everything else is ased off my recollection of what was said:

  • The internet has allowed people to discover kinks they didn’t know they had.
  • It also allows isolated people to find others like them (e.g. gay teenagers)
  • The decrease in marriage rates over the past few decades, along with the rise in cohabitation, might compel people to start talking to each other about what they really want in their relationship (lack of communication being one of the greatest problems in relationships).
  • As many as 3/4 of divorces cite Facebook in some way. Lack of communication beforehand is what really caused the divorce, most likely. The internet is a symptom of lack of connection in your real life.
  • The internet lets us discover new parts of ourselves, and we may find we want different things. Divorce doesn’t mean a marriage failed, just that people change.
  • “Our web history is the new porn stash.”
  • More straight people need to “come out” as allies to LGBTQ people, and as sex-positives.
  • Raise the stakes on talking about sex (treat it with respect) and lower the stakes at the same time.

Someone asked a question about Ashley Madison, the affair-based dating site. Rosie Q stressed that “none of us are pro-cheating; we’re pro-communication.” They noted that a site like that could be an example of how the web could be destructive to relationships. It gives people a save haven to get laid, but not to communicate in their marriages. Also, they asked rather rhetorically, what does it really mean to “save” a marriage?

Samsung Bloggers' LoungeI braved the elements to return to the Convention Center, and decided to check out the Samsung Bloggers’ Lounge. Lots of tables, but not much in the way of real “lounging.” Which was a shame, because I was tired, dammit. The major high point of that part of the day was the announcement, with a remarkable amount of fanfare, of the impending release of “Angry Birds: Space” from whomever makes “Angry Birds.” I had the choice between waiting in a line for a free Angry Birds t-shirt or sitting and finishing my blog post on Leslie Cochran. I’m sure the t-shirt I could have gotten will make someone else very happy.

Weapons of Mouse DestructionFor the last panel of the day, I went to “Iranian Outlaws: Satire vs. Censorship” (#SXOutlaws on Twitter). This was by an Iranian filmmaker who uses humor to fight the regime. His show is called “Parazit,” and it has been compared to “The Daily Show,” I hear. They use pictures sent in by Iranian kids and Photoshop them to make them funny. I missed a lot of the presentation, in part because I was late and in additional part because I was really freaking tired by then. He says that traffic dies out in Tehran on Fridays when their show is on. They became so popular that the Iranian government sent commandos to rooftops via helicopter to smash satellite dishes (he showed us pictures). They’ve developed a bigger project that looks pretty phenomenal, called Weapons of Mouse Destruction. There was apparently also a t-shirt involved in this presentation.

At this point, it was 6:00 p.m., and I had been downtown for almost 10 hours. But it was only two hours until TechKaraoke! I have been singularly unexcited about most nighttime SXSW activities, except this one. I just needed to kill some time.

I attempted to go to some tech-lawyer-themed party that ran from 5 to 7. After walking 6 blocks in frogod drizzle, I arrived at the bar at 6:30 to learn that, rather than ending in 30 minutes, the event ended 30 minutes earlier. I did not receive that memo.

And that is how I came to be standing in a doorway on 6th Street to shelter myself from the rain while eating a bratwurst.

Some random chick singing Whitesnake at TechKaraokeBut my tale does not end there. Finding myself momentarily without shelter or much of anything to do, I opted to show up to the bar hosting TechKaraoke early. They were busy. So I continued down the street. The good people of El Sol y la Luna were kind enough to take me in, let me sit at the bar, type most of this blog post, and sell me food at full price. I salute your Tex-Mex awesomeness.

After that, I went to TechKaraoke. After listening to two songs, I realized I was very tired and my back hurt from carrying a backpack around all day, so I went home. See all you geeks and hipsters tomorrow.

Share

You never know where you might find useful info

A combination of being on vacation (at home), being bored, and enjoying learning led to me to random Wikipedia pages on European history. That, in turn, led me to an interesting series of maps of Europe (yes, I’m a nerd; and no, you cannot give me a wedgie). What makes this notable is that, in addition to obviously-educationally-relevant maps showing language and religion and such, they also present these nuggets of wisdom: Legal status of cannabis in Europe, and Ages of sexual consent in Europe. I tried hotlinking the maps, but to no avail (the page won’t even let you right-click). More to the point, alongside maps showing population density and the like, you have a map showing where it’s legal to get baked and/or find a woman to go with your whiskey.

I think I saw all of this on a t-shirt once.

Point is, if anyone ever tells you they’re going to Europe based on information they got from a map on Eupedia, you might seriously consider punching that person in the groin very, very hard.

Share

Does anyone else think…

…that this whole Miley Cyrus topless thing is some sort of publicity stunt? I mean, she’s supposedly shocked, shocked and appalled at photographs for which she posed, probably for hours, but now she’s all over the headlines. I for one, was only vaguely aware of media personalities by the names Miley Cyrus and Hannah Montana, but I didn’t realize until this week they were the same person (or that Billy Ray Cyrus had procreated). But really, this is waaay more interesting than, say, the ongoing Iraq war, the reconsituted al-Qaeda force in Pakistan, or Russia and Georgia’s brewing war in Abkhazia. Just to name a few yawners.

Share