What I’m Reading, September 9, 2014

Tiptoeing Around the Civil Rights Act, Adam Lee, Daylight Atheism, September 3, 2014

The Civil Rights Act is an abiding dilemma for members of the right-wing Church of Not Gay. As marriage equality continues to progress, their latest cause celebre is arguing that believers should have the right to refuse service to gay couples – whether they be photographers, bakers, owners of wedding venues, even county clerks – all in the name, supposedly, of “religious liberty”, which they believe should be a trump card allowing holders to opt out of any generally applicable law.

The problem, from their perspective, is that the historical parallel is too raw and too obvious: it wasn’t that long ago that many business owners also demanded the right to refuse service to black people (and, yes, claimed a religious justification for doing so). From both a legal and a cultural standpoint, this argument has already been settled: business owners who offer a public accommodation can’t pick and choose their customers on the basis of irrelevant characteristics such as race, gender, or sexuality.

‘Sexual Liberty’ and Religious Freedom, Ed Brayton, Dispatches from the Culture Wars, September 5, 2014 Continue reading

Share

The Drones of West Africa

Atrios asks a question about the U.S. military’s planned expansion of drone use in Niger that is so sensible, it probably hasn’t occurred to most of the warmongers in our government and our pundit class:

There’s this weird country on the other side of the world that flies killing machines over your city on a regular basis. Does no one consider how one might grow up in that environment?

By U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Brian FergusonMarsRover at en.wikipedia [Public domain], from Wikimedia Commons

When Nigeriens start to hate the United States as much as people in certain other countries, we will not get to act surprised or perplexed.


Photo credit: By U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Brian FergusonMarsRover at en.wikipedia [Public domain], from Wikimedia Commons.

Share

“We would never condone raising funds for cancer research in this manner.”

An interesting twist in the ongoing debacle of the stolen/hacked nude celebrity photos is the effort by various people on the sub-Reddit known as the “Fappening” (a word I promise to use as little as possible) to raise money for prostate cancer research. Get it? A bunch of dudes doing, uh, dude stuff in front of their computers raising money for research into cancer of dude parts? It’s apparently funny to the sort of people who think any of this is a good idea.

Well, the Prostate Cancer Foundation isn’t laughing, nor is it accepting their donations:

The Prostate Cancer Foundation returned all money donated via a post on the website Reddit that was designed to make a joke about leaked naked images of Jennifer Lawrence and a slew of other famous women hacked from the women’s Apple iCloud accounts.

“We would never condone raising funds for cancer research in this manner. Out of respect for everyone involved and in keeping with our own standards, we are returning all donations that resulted from this post,” the foundation said in a statement Tuesday.

The dudebros on Reddit are now all butthurt about it. Good.

Share

Points for Effort in the Marriage Equality Cases?

The oral arguments in the Seventh Circuit case involving the marriage statutes in Indiana and Wisconsin sounds like they were extremely uncomfortable for those states’ attorneys general. In a way, I feel bad for the two attorneys who had to argue the case, but then again, they were trying to steer an obviously sinking ship. Ed Brayton posted some highlights from the hearing. This bit between the judges and Indiana Solicitor General Thomas Fisher seems like the trial advocacy equivalent of being rapped on the hand with a ruler:

JUDGE POSNER: “You allow the homosexual couples to adopt. Why don’t you want their children to have the same advantages as children adopted by heterosexual couples?”

FISHER: “The question is what can we do to nudge heterosexual couples who may produce children, you know, unintentionally to plan for this—to plan for the consequences and appreciate the consequences of sexual behavior. Those consequences don’t arise with same-sex couples. It’s not in the context of adoption that marriage—”

JUDGE POSNER: “But you’re not answering my question. You’ve got millions of adopted children, and a lot of them—200,000 or more—are adopted by same-sex couples. Why don’t you want their children to be as well off as the adopted children of heterosexual couples?” Continue reading

Share

What I’m Reading, September 4, 2014

Unreality TV: ‘Weekend Update’ and the landscape of fake news, Brian Phillips, Grantland, August 22, 2014

It would be a mistake, however, to write off “Update” as the less subversive precursor to a more radical age of news satire. In the early years in particular, it wasn’t that “Update” was soft; it was that the target was different. Saturday Night Live first aired a year after Nixon resigned, six months after the fall of Saigon. The old American public reality, I mean the Walter Cronkite, Fit to Print reality, was cracked down the middle but still more or less in place. TV channels were confined to a few stiff buttons on an oversize remote. Newspapers still published late editions. There was no Internet. The structure of American authority had been shown up as fatally flawed, but nothing emerged to replace it. The early “Weekend Update” sketches were less interested in using the power of the news to castigate corruption than in pointing out the fraudulence on which the power of the news was based. They showed Chevy Chase, a mock-up of the oracular newsman, murmuring dirty talk into a telephone, unaware that he was on the air.

Or they showed Dan Aykroyd and Jane Curtin, in a “Point/Counterpoint” debate, dropping the pretense of civility and saying what they really thought: “Jane, you ignorant slut.” “Dan, you pompous ass.”

Above all, they made the news, that somber institution, look innocuous and foolish, a province of irrelevant weirdos and harmless egomaniacs.

***

Is it strange that, of all the current-events products currently on television, it’s often Fox News that feels most like a “Weekend Update” bit? Critics are constantly asking why there’s no conservative Daily Show, but there is; it just won’t admit it’s a joke. The structure of Fox News is so deeply and basically comic that it’s impossible not to read it into the tradition of news satire. All those weeping paranoiacs! The fist-shaking curmudgeons! The gun-toting robo-blondes! Like “Weekend Update,” Fox succeeded by taking the elements of a normal news broadcast and exaggerating them to ludicrous proportions. Only instead of Opera Man, it has Angry Immigration Crusader; instead of Mr. Subliminal, it has Jowly Operative Insinuating Things About Hillary Clinton’s Health; instead of Gay Hitler, it has Outmatched Token Liberal; instead of “Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead,” it has Benghazi.

Be sure to read the full article. It has some brilliant Fox News screen captures.

Better Identification of Viking Corpses Reveals: Half of the Warriors Were Female, Stubby the Rocket, Tor.com, September 2, 2014 Continue reading

Share

I’ll Never Understand Some People’s Idea of “Art” (UPDATED)

I really do believe that some people mistake edginess, abrasiveness, or plain old controversy for “art.”

The recently leaked private images of Jennifer Lawrence and Kate Upton, among others, are set to be printed onto life-sized canvases and exhibited at an upcoming event held in Los Angeles.

Cory Allen Contemporary Art (CACA) has announced that the works will be among the new additions to artist XVALA’s “Fear Google” concept.

They are set to be displayed at his upcoming exhibition, named “No Delete”, at the CACA’s space The Showroom in Saint Petersburg, Florida.

The artist’s publicist, Cory Allen, said in a statement: “XVALA appropriating celebrity compromised images and the overall ‘Fear Google’ campaign has helped strengthen the ongoing debate over privacy in the digital era.

“The commentary behind this show is a reflection of who we are today. We all become ‘users’ and in the end, we become ‘used.'”

That’s quite a bold statement for an artist who uses a pseudonym and speaks through a publicist. I had never heard of XVALA before I saw this article, and I already hate them.

I thought this article was satire at first, initially because of the subject matter, and then because the promoter goes by the name CACA.

I am perfectly willing to accept that no one person gets to define “art,” and that any single piece of art will mean 50 different things to 40 different people. What I do not accept, however, is that displaying stolen, intimate photographs of people without their permission is any less a grotesque invasion of privacy if you add some pretentious artiste-speak to it, than if it was posted anonymously to 4Chan.

“In today’s culture, everybody wants to know everything about everybody. An individual’s privacy has become everyone else’s business,” XVALA added. “It has become cash for cache.”

Shut the hell up.

UPDATE (09/07/2014): Anne Laurie at Balloon Juice named XVALA “Douchecanoe of the Week,” and the description made it into his Wikipedia page. Well done, internet.

Share

What Were You Thinking???

You might have missed the news, but Home Depot is investigating a possibly-massive security breach that may have compromised the financial information of people who shopped at one of their stores from May through August of this year. Last year’s breach of Target’s computers was one of the biggest cybersecurity breaches in history, affecting around 40 million customers. This one might be bigger.

Last month, Albertson’s was hacked. CNN Money is now keeping a list of businesses where your financial data might have been compromised.

Yet no one blames consumers, first and foremost, for putting their personal financial data out there online. Just sayin’.

Share

What I’m Reading, September 1, 2014

At GOP luncheon, the hack is back, Gilbert Garcia, San Antonio Express-News, August 28, 2014 (h/t Marley)

After Wednesday’s meeting, a silver-haired woman with the Christian Coalition of Bexar County (an organization devoted to electing “God-fearing” leaders) approached me and asked if I would attend one of her group’s upcoming gatherings.

Almost immediately, she started peppering me with personal questions: What is my position on abortion? What church do I attend? Do I accept Jesus Christ as my personal savior?

I stumbled around for answers, so she insisted that I repeat after her a lengthy pledge to turn my life over to Christ. When I suggested that I didn’t feel comfortable making major spiritual declarations in the Fiesta Room at Luby’s, she looked at me like I was from Mars.

How Higher Education in the US Was Destroyed in 5 Basic Steps, Debra Leigh Scott, AlterNet, October 16, 2012 Continue reading

Share

Labor Day Movie Marathon

At Hullabaloo, Dennis Hartley offers a list of ten films to watch on Labor Day (h/t ql). I’m a bit embarrassed to say I’ve only seen one of these:

  • Blue Collar
  • El Norte
  • The Grapes of Wrath
  • Harlan County, USA
  • Made in Dagenhan
  • Matewan
  • Modern Times
  • Norma Rae
  • On the Waterfront
  • Roger and Me

Of all these, I’ve only seen On the Waterfront. The whole list seems worth a look, though.

I might add season 2 of The Wire to the list, which (spoiler alert) portrays the difficulties of labor today. One of the season’s plots involves the head of a stevedores’ union getting involved in drug trafficking—not as a way of making money in and of itself, but to pay for lobbyists to improve the job prospects for workers on Baltimore ‘s docks.

Share

What I’m Reading, August 28, 2014

Georgia man shoots self in hand outside bar, bullet kills nearby woman, Robyn Pennacchia, Death and Taxes, August 18, 2014

The man will be charged with “involuntary manslaughter.” Though if you ask me, taking a gun to a bar makes it pretty voluntary. I mean, if you get drunk and you have a gun on you, you assume the risk that you may fuck up and shoot yourself in the hand or “accidentally” shoot another person. You weigh the risks and you decide which is more important to you, and if you err on the side of “I’d rather have my gun with me, I will assume that risk” then you need to take responsibility for your choices.

Scarborough: ‘Who Would Put An Uzi In The Hands Of A Nine Year Old Girl?’ Susie Madrak, Crooks & Liars, August 27, 2014

Continue reading

Share