There Can Be Only One (Bacon)

I’m all for creativity in food, but this is just horrifying (h/t Jason):

bacon-shouldnt-have-to-come-from-a-pig

I’d like to hear what Ron Swanson has to say regarding bacon made from jicama or eggplant:

Ukh1uMJ

Share

This Week in WTF, April 11, 2014

– As Smooth as a Spring Evening in Highgarden: Okay, I have no idea what could legitimately be called “smooth” in Westeros. Anyway, here’s the Game of Thrones theme played as smooth jazz:

– Heh heh. “Wood.”: A woman who found a tree stump carved into the shape of a phallus in her neighborhood did what any responsible citizen would do—she called the police (h/t Bob). No word on whether they had to use force against the tree stump.

– It’s for a good cause: I realize that charitable causes can have a difficult time raising awareness, but this is (hopefully) the first time anyone has thought of Tasering a woman in a bikini, and charging people to watch.

Share

What I’m Reading, April 10, 2014

Photo credit: Nemo [CC0 1.0], via PixabayOn Ignoring Sound Methodologies: Empiricism, Scientism, And Other Ways Of Knowing, Academic Atheism, April 5, 2014

Lately, there’s been a move away from either taking empirical methodology at face value, so to speak, or attempts to demonstrate its weaknesses. Instead, there’s been a move toward avoiding it and/or claiming that some other methodology is better. People who did this, however, haven’t offered any good justification for claiming their methodology is better. The issue is that such thinking is beginning to become more widespread.

That leads to any even greater problem. Effectively, what ends up happening is that such people forgo their respect for truth. They’re basically stating that their prized opinion matters more than the truth—that they want to believe despite the evidence at hand. Prior to showing why empirical methodology can’t be avoided, it is useful to deal with some accusations—accusations that have become quite persistent and that rest in a misunderstanding.

The Sham of Conservative Originalism, Ed Brayton, Dispatches from the Culture Wars, April 7, 2014

Conservative originalism has always been a sham, a pretense of objectivity where there is none. Justice Scalia, in particular, loves to lecture everyone on how his textualism and originalism are objective, as opposed to all those liberal justices who only care about the outcome of the case. That’s simply a lie. Scalia himself is absolutely an outcome-based judge; compare his opinion on the scope of the Interstate Commerce Clause in Raich to his opinion in the health care reform case from two years ago, that is all the proof you will need. There are lots and lots of ways to manipulate originalism to get the result you want, including picking and choosing which views of the founding fathers are the ones that matter.

Republican SBOE Member Asks if Non-Mexican Americans Will Be Included in Mexican-American Studies, Katherine Haenschen, Burnt Orange Report, April 9, 2014

Republican SBOE Member Ken Mercer asked during a hearing on Mexican-American Studies if Cuban-Americans Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz would be included in the curriculum.

The debate centered on the potential creation of a Mexican American studies course that could be offered as an elective to the entire state. The SBOE would need to develop and approve the new course’s curriculum.

Hispanic students are the largest ethnic group in Texas public school systems. The overwhelming majority are of Mexican descent. It should be common sense that Texas public school students should be able to learn about leaders who share their heritage. After all, it seems to be working out just fine for the white kids.

The fact that Ken Mercer cannot distinguish between Cuban Americans and Mexican Americans suggests that this coursework is sorely needed.

8 Things America Gets Wrong About Sex, Amanda Duberman, Huffington Post, April 7, 2014

It’s difficult to distill America’s sexphobia into a few list-friendly factors. Rather, a puritanical seed planted around the 1700s, nourished by national identity, has grown into a sinister vine tightly wound around many of our public institutions. While antiquated laws about women and sex are lampooned for comedy and shows like “Masters Of Sex” and “Girls” are all over premium cable, the stigma around sex and sexuality persists where it hurts the most: in the classroom, doctor’s office, at political conventions and sometimes, in the voting booth.

Photo credit: Nemo [CC0 1.0], via Pixabay.

Share

Some Gen X Reading

In a few months, I’ll be turning 40. I think this is supposed to be a big deal, but so far it’s eliciting a big old “meh” from me.

"I'm paralyzed with not caring very much." - Spike

I’m pretty sure there is no way that my generation will be as insufferable about hitting middle age as the Boomers were, but everything is relative, and we won’t be the ones to make the final determination. I guess time will tell.

Anyway, I came across a few good screeds about the malaise of the Gen Xer. Read on, and remember how we used to have to read about what a bunch of slackers we all were in periodicals printed on paper.

Share

Test Your Geography Knowledge!

This one’s a doozy. No multiple choice or “find X on a map.” You just type in the name of every country you can think of in twelve minutes (h/t Kerry).

Screen Shot 2014-04-10 at 11.06.00 AM

I got all but three, although not many people get those countries right on the test: Antigua and Barbuda (12%), São Tomé and Príncipe (7%), and Fiji (29%). I can’t believe I forgot Fiji! My brain must have frozen or something.

Spelling can be an issue, too. I got lucky on Kyrgyzstan and the Philippines (one “l”), but kept misspelling Guatemala.

(I should note that I’m kind of a showoff about this sort of thing. None of my friends will play Trivial Pursuit with me anymore.)

Share

The Deep End of the Indian Ocean

"Illustration from the original 1870 edition of Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea by author Jules Verne" [Public domain], via Wikimedia CommonsAn Australian ship my have detected pings consistent with a black box, and now a search plane has also detected a signal. The signal could be from the still-missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, but no one can say for certain. The main problem, of course, is that even if the signal is coming from the black box, the black box is somewhere on the bottom of the Indian Ocean.

The Washington Post has a graphic illustrating just how freaking deep that part of the ocean is (h/t Georgette). The signal was detected at a depth of around 15,000 feet, which is also the deepest known part of that area. It’s also almost 500 feet deeper than Mount Whitney, the tallest mountain in the contiguous U.S., is tall. The pressure there is 6,680 psi, or more than 454 times the air pressure at the earth’s surface (measured as 1 atmosphere). That amount of pressure is unhealthy for humans.

Despite all that, it’s less than half the depth of the Mariana Trench in the Pacific, which at around 36,000 feet (about as deep as cruising altitude is high) is the deepest point on the earth. Only three people have ever been to the bottom, and one of them is filmmaker James Cameron. We should just put him in charge of the search. Continue reading

Share

A Fun Way to Troll the Entire English-Speaking World

Connie Ma [CC BY-SA 2.0], via FlickrLet’s start referring to massage therapists as “massaginists.”

Photo credit: Connie Ma [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Flickr.

Share

What I’m Reading, April 9, 2014

By Marc Gallant (Flickr) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia CommonsI’m Not Your Disappearing Indian, Jacqueline Keeler, Indian Country Today Media Network, April 3, 2014 (via Jezebel)

No, it wasn’t Stephen Colbert who forgot about us, nor was it “Stephen Colbert,” a character played by comedian Stephen Colbert, to satirize the extreme insensitivity of Republican conservatism. His show,The Colbert Reportdid a whole skit skewering Dan Snyder, billionaire owner of the Washington Redsk*ns, and Snyder’s new Original Americans Foundation (OAF), exposing it — through satire — as a blatant attempt to use charity to provide cover for his NFL team’s racist name. It was the hashtaggers, PoC (People of Color) and progressives, our own allies on Twitter who trended the hashtag #CancelColbert in response to the fictional foundation’s name featured in the skit.  And yet, Dan Snyder’s real foundation promoting an ethnic slur against us, a foundation thatactually exists, failed to garner even a tiny fraction of outrage by the same group. In fact, in her Time Magazine article that followed the enormous success of #CancelColbert, hashtag originator Suey Park failed to mention Snyder’s foundation at all. She certainly did not mention the Native hashtag protesting it #Not4Sale, despite it being covered by Mike Wise at the Washington Post and Al Jazeera America’s The Stream just days before. Only one reporter, Jeff Yang of the Wall Street Journal included any mention of Native responses to it.

Mega-Donors Are Now More Important Than Most Politicians, Peter Beinart, The Atlantic, April 4, 2014

The astonishing concentration of wealth among America’s super-rich, combined with a Supreme Court determined to tear down the barriers between their millions and our elections, is once again shifting the balance of power between politicians and donors. You could see it during last weekend’s “Sheldon primary,” when four major presidential contenders flocked to Las Vegas to court one man. When Chris Christie, not known for backing down from a fight, used a phrase (“occupied territories”) that Adelson disliked, he quickly apologized. And with good reason. Adelson, who probably spent north of $100 million in the 2012 election, can single-handedly sustain a presidential candidacy, or wreck one. He’s certainly wields more influence over American politics than most members of the United States Senate.

It’s time the press starts behaving accordingly. The media, for the most part, still treats elected officials as the key players in our political process. They get most of the scrutiny. Mega-donors, by contrast, are permitted a substantial degree of anonymity. Now that must change. If Adelson or the Koch brothers or their liberal equivalents can single-handedly shape presidential campaigns and congressional majorities, their pet concerns and ideological quirks deserve more journalistic attention than do those of most members of congress. It’s no longer enough to have one reporter covering the “money and politics” beat. Special correspondents should be assigned to cover key mega-donors, and should work doggedly to make their private influence public.

Photo credit: By Marc Gallant (Flickr) [CC-BY-2.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

Share

How Creationists Are Like Wooderson

A Facebook post demonstrating one person’s misunderstanding of how science works got me thinking about how people who favor religious faith over scientific evidence differ from the rest of us.

I admit its a matter of faith in God for me. evidence just seems so slippery and of no significance, because of interpretations and lack of knowledge of what actually happened in the beginning.

I realized that this sort of religious viewpoint channels Wooderson to a remarkable degree. That would be the character made iconic by Matthew McConaughey in Richard Linklater’s 1993 film Dazed and Confused, responsible for such pearls of wisdom as “You just gotta keep livin’ man, L-I-V-I-N.” And of course, “All right, all right, all right.” His most famous quote, of course, is this one: Continue reading

Share

What I’m Reading, April 8, 2014

Every review of Black Widow in ‘Captain America’ is wrong, Gavia Baker-Whitelaw, The Daily Dot, April 2, 2014

Honestly, this kind of catsuit-focused review says more about the reviewer than the film itself. Apparently the mere concept of Scarlett Johansson in a tight outfit is so dazzlingly erotic that it bypasses some male reviewers’ conscious minds and causes them to ignore everything she says and does for the rest of the movie. The result is a series of reviews from highly respected film critics who, given the opportunity to describe each Avenger in a single sentence, replace Black Widow’s summary with the announcement, “I AM A HETEROSEXUAL MAN AND SCARLETT JOHANSSON’S BOOBS ARE AWESOME.”

Yes, the Cover of Golf Digest Is Tacky, Gross, and Exclusionary. But So Is Golf. Philip Bump, The Wire, April 4, 2014

It’s actually perfect that Golf Digest‘s cover image of sexy, non-golfer Paulina Gretzky has irritated people for being sexist and exclusionary. After all, nothing provides a better digest of golf than exclusion, annoyance, cultural damage, and self-absorption.

***

Here is the thing: Golf is the worst sport, if it is a sport at all. Golf is worse than NASCAR, and I say that fully understanding the weight of those words. Golf is worse because it is more classist, more racist, and probably more environmentally harmful than car racing. And what’s really remarkable about golf is how little legwork it takes to demonstrate each of those qualities.

[Ed. note: For the actual cover, see here.]

Share